Severe Security Flaw Found in IE
Update: Microsoft acknowledges potential SSL vulnerability, uncovered by security researcher.
David Legard, IDG News Service
A security flaw in Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser can completely undermine the supposedly watertight Secure Sockets Layer standard for securing online transactions and e-commerce, researchers said Tuesday.
IE's implementation of SSL contains a vulnerability which allows what is described as an active, undetected, man-in-the-middle attack, where no dialogs are shown and no warnings are given.
Security researcher Mike Benham says the problem is that IE fails to check the Basic Constraints of certificates signed by intermediate Certificate Authorities. That means that as far as IE is concerned, anyone with a signed certificate for any domain can generate a certificate for any other domain, which will appear to be signed by a valid CA.
Describing the flaw, Internet security Web site Hideaway.net says: "Spoofing a trusted Web site is thus a trivial exploit; when combined with session hijacking, a man-in-the-middle attack is quite feasible. This destroys the whole purpose of SSL certificates in the first place."
Open to Attack?
Benham says that IE 5 and IE 5.5 are totally vulnerable to this kind of exploit, and IE 6 is vulnerable under most circumstances.
"I would consider this to be incredibly severe," Benham says in a newsgroup thread. "Any of the standard connection hijacking techniques can be combined with this vulnerability to produce a successful man in the middle attack. Since no warnings are given and no dialogs are shown, the attacker has effectively circumvented all security that an SSL certificate provides."
Microsoft, which is currently investigating the vulnerability report, was not as quick to call the exploit trivial.
The scenario described by Benham would be difficult to exploit since it would require a man-in-the-middle attack, something a Microsoft spokeswoman called, in an e-mail to the IDG News Service, "technically difficult, temporary, and (requiring) favorable network topography."
The attack scenario is also not as anonymous as Benham charges, as it requires a valid certificate and the CA that had issued the certificate would have a record of to whom it had been sold, the spokeswoman said.
Lastly, if the user were to inspect the certificate, they would find that it was from someone they hadn't heard of and should therefore be suspicious, she added.
Fix in Flux
Microsoft has given no indications that it plans to fix this flaw, and Benham says his experience shows it will be difficult to get Microsoft to address the issue.
"Last week I saw Microsoft downplay and obfuscate the severity of the IE vulnerability that Adam Megacz reported," he writes in the newsgroup thread. That vulnerability could allow Javascript-enabled browsers to make available to an external attacker the contents of machines located on a local network or intranet.
"After seeing that, I don't feel like wasting time with the Microsoft PR department," Benham says.
Microsoft has long been an advocate of so-called "responsible disclosure," meaning that researchers ought to give their vulnerability findings to vendors and wait until a patch has been released before disclosing their information. The policy has created controversy in the security research community, with some arguing that better security is achieved through full disclosure, the immediate publication of vulnerability information. In such circles, responsible disclosure is often derided as "security through obscurity."
Sticking to the responsible disclosure line, the spokeswoman said that "only Microsoft can investigate at a source code level; only Microsoft can build a patch, if needed."
"We're very concerned that publishing a report in this fashion could cause users to be concerned and apprehensive; if (Benham) had handled it correctly, we all would be in a better position to understand the real scope, and remediation (of the vulnerability)," she said.
- Sponsored Resource:Improve your network with the right mix of features, performance and pricing.
- Sponsored Resource:Growing your business requires the right tools. Dell's networking servers can help.
- Sponsored Resource:Thinking about a new Laptop? Lenovo has models to meet everyone's needs.
- Sponsored Resource:Twitter: A how-to guide for using Twitter as a business tool.
- Sponsored Resource:Smartphone security threats are on the rise. Is it time to safegaurd your device?
Print 65% more pages than with refilled inks. Trust Original HP Inks. Hit Print Reliably.
Microsoft Office Home and Student 2007
Featured APC Accessories For Your System
10% Off Entire Cart at Online Store
-
APC Back-UPS ES
Safeguards your equipment from damaging surges and spikes that travel along your utility & data lines.
- APC SurgeArrest Performance Highest level of protection for your professional computers, electronics and connected devices, as well as provides surge protection.
People who read this also read:
Best Prices on Antivirus Software
Norton AntiVirus 2009 (Full Product)Price: $14.87
Anti-Virus 2009 (Full Product)Price: $17.85
VirusScan Plus 2009 - 3-User (Full Product)Price: $4.00
VirusScan Plus 2009 (Full Product)Price: $4.00
McAfee VirusScan Plus 2008 (Full Product)Price: $3.23
Mcafee McAfee 2009 VirusScan Plus- 1 User Download Version (VSF09E001RKA)Price: $12.27
- 2007 Microsoft Office Suites Comparison This paper compares and contrasts four suites of the 2007 Microsoft Office system: Microsoft Office Standard 2007, Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2007, Microsoft Office Enterprise 2007 and Microsoft Office Ultimate 2007. This paper is intended to help organizations understand the applications and capabilities offered, and to identify the suite that best fits their needs.
- Windows Vista Migration: The Business Proposition It's not so much a matter of "if" but "when" for most organizations regarding migration to Windows Vista. Laying the groundwork now for this migration can yield higher ROI than waiting until later. This Computerworld Technology Briefing explains it all.


