Quantcast
PCWorld.com is upgrading some back-end systems. Some site features, such as user registration, may be temporarily unavailable.

Greater Graphics

You don't have to be a gamer to benefit from a better graphics card. Our lab tests identify the best choices, from $99 boards to sophisticated dual-card setups.

Richard Baguley

  • 0 Yes
  • 0 No

$100 Cards Bump Up Performance, on a Budget

Click to view full-size image.

Photograph: Rick Rizner
We wanted to get an idea of what benefits a $100 graphics card could give to an upgradable system with integrated graphics. So we tested a couple of these low-cost cards using a $1394 Dell Dimension 5150 system with a 3.2-GHz processor and 512MB of RAM.

After running a series of tests using the Graphics Media Accelerator 950 chip that was integrated in the PC's Intel 945G chip set, we upgraded the system with two PCI Express graphics cards: first the $99 XFX GeForce 6600 and then the $102 Sapphire Radeon X1300. The GMA 950 is the fastest integrated graphics chip Intel currently offers, and the two boards we tried are among the least expensive mainstream cards available. Although the two boards include recent GPUs, they use 256MB of DDR2 (not DDR3) memory to keep the price down. Both support dual monitors.

Head to Head

Although we again used games to put the Sapphire, XFX, and integrated graphics options through their paces, we also applied WorldBench 5, which employs a range of programs in testing. This way, we could get a reasonable idea of the performance increase to be derived in everyday tasks.

Adding XFX's card boosted the Dell test system's WorldBench 5 score to 88, an improvement of about 5 percent over the score with the integrated graphics. The Sapphire card's gain was more modest, increasing the WorldBench 5 score to 86, a plus of about 2 percent. Though both dedicated budget cards made daily tasks slightly faster, we were happily surprised at how the integrated graphics stood up in our tests.

As expected, gaming got the most gains. Our test system could not run Battlefield 2 with the integrated graphics, but it was able to achieve a very smooth 43 frames per second with the XFX and a barely playable 25 fps with the Sapphire. Half-Life 2 also seriously improved from the unplayable 11 fps achieved with the integrated graphics, which also had problems rendering some effects.

These test results suggest that even an inexpensive graphics card can make your upgradable PC with integrated graphics faster. A new card can definitely provide you with more output options, as well, such as S-Video-out and multiple monitor connections. Gaming certainly receives the greatest benefit: Although neither card was as quick as the much more expensive models we tested, both produced improvements over the integrated graphics.

In short, we found that even an upgradable PC with newer integrated graphics could achieve modest gains with a $100 card. Moreover, it's clear that such an addition should give an older upgradable system built with less-modern integrated graphics new power and a new lease on life.

Cheap Cards, Modest Gains
Even budget cards help boost system and gaming performance versus what you get with integrated graphics.

Chart notes: Antialiasing options used for all tests. Game performance times are in frames per second; higher numbers are better. Data based on tests designed and conducted by the PC World Test Center. All rights reserved. For more, see the full description of our testing procedures.

Richard Baguley

  • Recommend this story?
  • 0 Yes
    0 No

"Greater Graphics" Comments

Featured APC Accessories

  • APC Back-UPS ES Safeguards your equipment from damaging surges and spikes that travel along your utility & data lines.
  • APC SurgeArrest Performance Highest level of protection for your professional computers, electronics and connected devices, as well as provides surge protection.

Deal Breakers

Special Offers for PC World Users

People who read this also read:

Sponsored Links