Which Flavor of RAID?
When the term RAID was originally coined, the phrase "redundant array of inexpensive disks" was a vision of the putative future. Now, with the price per megabyte in disks astoundingly low, RAID is a superb option for improving both speed and reliability in a desktop machine that has at least two hard-drive bays.
The idea behind RAID is that you pick two targets, one being
RAID 1, for instance, mirrors all data, writing the same data to each of two drives at the same time. If one drive goes south, the other is fully available. Your total storage capacity is half the total of drive space: two 500GB drives equals 500GB of storage.
RAID 0 stripes data, interleaving blocks to extract more speed out of the hard-drive data transfer system--that is, you can use two 7200-rpm drives, but effectively have a far higher speed. RAID 0 offers the full capacity of all drives: Two 500GB drives equals 1TB of capacity.
RAID 5 stripes data and error-correction information across three or more drives. If any one drive dies, the others can reconstruct the missing details, and you lose much less storage than with simple mirroring. With RAID 5 and drives of the same capacity, you lose just the equivalent of a single drive's worth of space in the set. With three 500GB drives, for instance, you have 1TB of storage; with four 500GB drives, you have 1.5TB.
You can combine RAID 0 and RAID 1 as 0+1, which provides both speed and backup, but RAID 5 is usually seen as a superior alternative, even though it can be more costly. It requires at least three drives, but can use many more, and you can expand sets later. If you think you'll want a larger set of storage drives down the road, you need to make sure that your desktop has enough drive bays.
Major desktop PC makers typically include hardware support for RAID 0, 1, and 0+1 even in their less-expensive systems, but for built-in RAID 5 support, you may need to select a higher-priced business workstation; this option
That additional cost is partly offset for sets of four or more disks of large capacity compared to RAID 0+1, however, because you drop the cost of drives necessary for the same amount of total storage in RAID 5.
Our verdict: For best use, choosing either RAID 0+1 or RAID 5 makes sense, but RAID 5 clearly provides the best combination of speed and reliability, even at a higher cost.
Power Consumption: Look at Energy Star
We'd all like to cut our power bills, and Energy Star-qualified computers could be part of that process. If you're upgrading computers and your new machine uses more energy than your old one, you're increasing your so-called carbon footprint; but a system that meets Energy Star guidelines at least increases your power use less than does a comparable system that hasn't been designed to meet the marks of this Environmental Protection Agency program.
With a laptop--or a refrigerator, for that matter--a specific model with more or less the same features can be tested and its usage estimated. But when you can upgrade a processor to double the baseline model's speed and stick in four hard drives instead of two, the baseline numbers help only a little in calculating the final energy bill.
Still, because Energy Star's rules for desktops and workstations--tightened in 2007--require an efficient power supply and intelligent power reductions in standby and idle modes, you're still
Our verdict: Energy Star shouldn't be the deciding factor, but it's worth crunching numbers with your local electrical rates against other models you'd be considering.