Buying a Wireless Router — Simplified

When I need to know something about routers, my first stop is typically run by Tim Higgins. It's a site for techies rather than the general public and, at times, it's very techie.

But last week, Higgins took a step down, and published an introductory article called How To Buy a Wireless Router: The Short Version. Highly recommended.

Most of the article covers the differences between the four major types of routers: Single-band G, Single-band N, Dual-band-single-radio N and Dual-band-dual-radio N. He also warns readers away from a fifth category, N150 routers.

Some interesting observations from the article follow.

No doubt many people think that Wi-Fi N is better than G and they should always opt for N. But Higgins says:

"...if you already have a wireless LAN with all G devices and you're happy with its performance, there is no reason to change to "N". "Upgrading" to an N router won't increase your range or speed up your G devices. On the contrary, it could end up causing problems with very old gear."

It came as news to me that a new N router may be a problem for old G hardware.

Higgins offers another reason you might opt for a cheaper G router as opposed to a more expensive N model:

"...whenever there are G and N devices connected to the same N type router, they both will operate at slower speed, but only when both are active."

Just like the old days, when B clients slowed down a G router.

Finally, he warns that all Wi-Fi N adapters are not the same; some support the 5 GHz band and some don't. He cited Dell, specifically, for not providing this information anywhere in the specs for a particular Inspiron laptop. In this case, the N adapter did support the 5 GHz band, but you would have to check Intel's website to find out.

A very worthwhile read.

Shop ▾
arrow up Amazon Shop buttons are programmatically attached to all reviews, regardless of products' final review scores. Our parent company, IDG, receives advertisement revenue for shopping activity generated by the links. Because the buttons are attached programmatically, they should not be interpreted as editorial endorsements.