The popular press is full of articles braying news about Internet addiction; try typing "Internet addiction" into the search field of your favorite search engine and start browsing. A Google search in mid-December brought up 768,000 English, French and German pages on the topic.
You've won . . . an Internet addiction
The popular Web site netaddiction.com has a self-test anyone can take to computer a score suggesting the degree of "level of addiction." The scoring chart provides the following guidance:
The higher your score, the greater your level of addiction and the problems your Internet usage causes. Here's a general scale to help measure your score:
Why does this text send shivers down my back? Could it possibly be because it's too easy?
In a scholarly meta-analysis of 39 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles about quantitative research on Internet addiction published between 1996 and 2006, an international team of researchers [1] found that many authors had failed to define Internet addiction; others had contradictory definitions. The research team chose to define Internet addiction as follows:
For the purposes of this study, we define Internet addiction following Beard's holistic approach wherein "an individual is addicted when an individual's psychological state, which includes both mental and emotional states, as well as their scholastic, occupational and social interactions, is impaired by the overuse of the medium."[2]
Byun et al. found that:
More on this topic in the next column.
* * *
References:
[1] Byun, S., C. Ruffini, J. E. Mills, A. C. Douglas, M. Niang, S. Stepchenkova, S. K. Lee, J. Loutfi, J.-K. Lee, M. Atallah, and M. Blanton (2008). "Internet Addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 Quantitative Research." CyberPsychology & Behavior 12(2):203-207. Downloaded 2009-12-14 through EBSCO Host online database via Kreitzberg Library at Norwich University.
[2] The quotation from Byun et al. includes internal reference 18, which is listed as follows: Beard KW. Internet addiction: a Review of current assessment techniques and potential assessmen questions. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2005; 8:7–14.
















