Virtualization Roundup: Four Lab Managers Tested and Reviewed
InfoWorld review: VMware vCenter Lab Manager 4.0
VMware's vCenter Lab Manager 4.0 is the defining product in this category, not only because it's from VMware, the 800-pound gorilla in virtualization, but because it's an excellent product with obvious enterprise credentials. The product shows up in some of the biggest deployments of lab virtualization, such as a large ISV that uses it on a configuration consisting of 3,000 virtual machines running on 100 hosts supported by 27TB of storage.
Installation of Lab Manager is a complex task that has the feel of heavy enterprise. VMLogix and Surgient were also difficult to install and configure, but VMware requires a three-step process: first ESX 4, then VMware vCenter, and finally Lab Manager. vCenter already contains many management features; however, Lab Manager adds capabilities that greatly facilitate the configuration and deployment of transient systems.
Prior to the advent of vCenter, Lab Manager managed the hosts directly. Today, it goes primarily through vCenter. This step enables admins to see a correct image of their systems from the vCenter console. Lab Manager does install an agent on the ESX hosts that routes the VM consoles to Lab Manager, where they are accessible via RDP and SSH. The screen image below shows thumbnails of these VMs as they appear in Lab Manager. (Click image for closer view.)
Lab Manager has a SOAP interface, which enables sites to provision virtual machines via Web services. (This is in addition to the SOAP interface in VMware ESX, which provides the ability to perform a variety of administrative tasks.) Lab Manager's SOAP access enables QA and development staff to create and run VMs on the fly during testing runs -- a unique and valuable benefit.
Another salient feature of Lab Manager is that, like VMLogix, it can enable complex, multihomed VMs that attach to multiple networks (including a bridge to the outside net) via multiple virtual NICs.
Lab Manager also provides a unique configuration switch that forces a CPU to emulate 32-bit architecture, even if it is a 64-bit processor. This enables backward compatibility with some applications and early versions of some Linux distributions -- reinforcing VMware's reputation for being able to run an enormous swath of legacy systems.
VMware's approach to license monitoring and user management is different from the other vendors, and in my opinion, vCenter Lab Manager 4.0 trails the other products reviewed here. VMware's entire management layer for users and licenses consists of limiting permissions of users and user roles. While VMLogix and Surgient enable you to enforce a maximum number of machines that use a given software license (VMLogix takes this one step further by having hard and soft limits), VMware attempts to reach the same ends by limiting who can create virtual machines. At that point, it's up to those individuals to monitor their own license deployments. I find this to be a distinct shortcoming.
Lab Manager also lacks the scheduling layer found in Surgient (as does VMLogix). In this sense, Lab Manager gives the impression of being more of a lab tool than an IT-oriented product -- that is, it hews closely to its origins as a development and test solution.
VMware is the least expensive product in this review. To its cost must be added the price of vCenter. However, for sites that have already committed to VMware's products and invested in vCenter, the good pricing and the natural product fit make it a highly attractive option.
VMware vCenter Lab Manager 4.0PCWorld Rating
Surgient Virtual Automation Platform 7PCWorld Rating
VMLogix LabManagerPCWorld Rating
Skytap CloudPCWorld Rating