Email snooping corralled in Texas; other states may follow
Texas has become the first state in the nation to require law enforcement to obtain a warrant to read people's email, and privacy advocates are hoping the move will help quicken the passage of a similar proposal in Congress.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed the privacy bill last week. The proposal was introduced in the Legislature by 29-year-old Republican Rep. Jonathan Stickland, a conservative with Tea Party backing. Liberals also supported the measure.
While the Lone Star state is the first, it is unlikely to be the last to pass such a law. The California Legislature is considering a bill barring warrantless email surveillance and snooping on messages and profile information stored on social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter.
A prod for Congress?
Privacy advocates are hoping that states passing such laws will pressure Congress to amend the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which requires a warrant only for unopened email. Opened messages, as well as email left unopened for more than 180 days, do not require federal law enforcement to get a warrant.
"The big impact is a signal to Congress that you can pass this type of law and the world will not fall apart and the sky will not fall," said Hanni Fakhoury, staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Voters are unlikely to retaliate at the polls if lawmakers pass such legislation, Fakhoury said, and "whether you are local law enforcement or federal law enforcement, you can still stop the bad guys."
The Stored Communications Act, enacted in 1986 as part of the ECPA, gives states the right to pass privacy laws more stringent than federal statutes, according to Fakhoury. "The federal Stored Communications Act is a floor, and the states can enact stronger protections."
States can't change feds
However, state laws only apply to local law enforcement and cannot be used to force federal authorities to obtain warrants or to impede their investigations.
State and federal law enforcement often work under differing laws that apply to the same issue, and have learned to deal with the conflicts. "The idea that (the state law) is going to make (investigations) any harder is a cop-out," Fakhoury said.
Legal experts consider the 27-year-old ECPA woefully outdated and Congress is working on an update. The ECPA Amendments Act of 2013 would require a warrant for electronic communications stored with a service provider, such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo.
The four Internet companies have said that they require warrants before handing over the contents of customers' electronic communications to government entities. How often the companies win in challenging government entities is not clear.
Nevertheless, state lawmakers are starting to bolster privacy. Maine lawmakers passed last month a bill that would require a warrant for gathering location information from mobile phones. Enactment is pending while the Legislature looks for funding.
However, law enforcement has had success in arguing against such laws. A bill similar to Maine's died in the Montana Legislature in April and was vetoed last year by California Gov. Jerry Brown, who was concerned that it would hamper criminal investigations.
State and federal law enforcement often work under differing laws that apply to the same issue, and have learned to deal with the conflicts. "The idea that (the state law) is going to make (investigations) any harder is a cop out," Fakhoury said.
All of the above laws and bills apply only to criminal cases within the U.S. They have no impact on cases involving national security, such as recent revelations of the National Security Agency's wide-ranging surveillance of electronic communications.