Google+, Day 26: Comparing Google+ with Twitter

Google+ gives me the same opportunity to share updates with people outside of my social network--and the public at large--but without limiting the length of my post. Ultimately, though, this is not a black and white issue with a clear winner.

The Google+ approach is much more flexible, and allows for richer posts, but it can also cause more clutter. The Twitter system is genius in its simplicity, and it fills a unique niche thanks to that annoying 140-character limitation.

30 Days With Google+ wouldn't be complete without comparing it to Facebook and Twitter.
Privacy. On Twitter, I have none. Well, almost none. It is possible to set my Twitter profile up as private where only those I allow are able to see my tweets. I can also just direct message (DM) someone who is following me for a private one on one chat. But, anything I tweet out the normal way is shared with the world--those who are following me will see my tweet in their stream, and anyone else who doesn't follow me can still find and see my tweet by searching Twitter.

Google+, on the other hand, straddles the fence between Twitter and Facebook and enables me to choose on a post by post basis whether the update should be share with the general public, or just my Circles, or just a specific Circle, or maybe even just designated individuals.

From my perspective, it seems like Mark Zuckerberg has not used Google+ at all. But, it's possible that he's posting 100 times a day, but just not sharing those posts with the general public, which means they don't show up for me.

Audience. Twitter has roughly ten times the audience of Google+ right now. Yes, I realize that Google+ is still in limited "Field Trial" mode, and that it is not a fair comparison. But, even when Google+ launches to the general public, it will still have some catching up to do.

From a marketing or breaking news perspective, Twitter is a more valuable tool--and will continue to be more valuable for quite a while--because it offers a larger audience to broadcast to.

In the end, both Google+ and Twitter offer me the ability to follow others who aren't in my social network, as well as a platform for broadcasting my own updates to those outside my social network who choose to follow me, and to the general public.

I see the difference a little like comparing CNN Headline News to the main CNN channel--Twitter is Headline News and Google+ is CNN. Let me explain.

CNN is a great source of news, and devotes more time to investigating stories, talking with experts, presenting both sides, and diving deeper into the topic at hand. But, if I just want to know what is going on in the world right now, I would rather switch over to Headline News where I can just get the 30-second sound bites that basically announce the headlines and let me know what the breaking news is.

Similarly, both Google+ and Twitter are good sources of information, but Twitter is still better for just keeping up with breaking news and trending topics, while Google+ provides a platform for more comprehensive coverage of those same topics.

Read the last "30 Days" series: 30 Days With the iPad

Day 25: Another Look at Google+ Privacy

Day 27: Comparing Google+ with Facebook

Shop ▾
arrow up Amazon Shop buttons are programmatically attached to all reviews, regardless of products' final review scores. Our parent company, IDG, receives advertisement revenue for shopping activity generated by the links. Because the buttons are attached programmatically, they should not be interpreted as editorial endorsements.

Subscribe to the Best of PCWorld Newsletter

Comments