Google Tweaks Advanced Search: Change Irks Some

Google has quietly removed the Boolean + operator from its search options--and replaced it with expanded quotation mark functionality. For those who don't use Boolean search operators, this isn't a big deal, but for us search ninjas it's a pretty big inconvenience.

The Boolean + operator, when placed in front of a specific search term, would guarantee that the search results returned contained that exact term. For example, if you searched for sarah jacobsson purewal +pcworld, the search results would definitely have "pcworld" in them. This is important because searching for sarah jacobsson purewal pcworld (without the + operator) will return some search results without "pcworld" in them.

According to Google Search Community Manager Kelly F, Google has replaced the + operator with expanded quotation mark functionality. In other words, putting quotation marks around the specific search term will now return the same results as putting a + in front of the search term used to return. So, now you must search for sarah jacobsson purewal "pcworld" instead of sarah jacobsson purewal +pcworld.

Like the + operator, the quotes must be around a single word (the + operator had to be in front of a single word--not a phrase) to work properly. If you put quotation marks around a phrase, you'll still get search results with that specific phrase.

As Danny Sullivan from Search Engine Land notes, this is a pretty big disappointment for those of us who use Boolean operators in our searches.

"I can't believe Google has done this. I use the + command all the time, especially in an age when more and more, Google constantly reshapes a search based on what it guesses a searcher wants, rather than what they entered," Sullivan writes.

Boolean operators are as old as search engines themselves, and they're a quick, convenient way to find what you want from Google. Though the functionality is still there, quotation marks around each term are, obviously, slightly more of a hassle.

I'm not sure why Google has discarded the + operator, especially since it doesn't seem like it was really hurting anyone.

However, if I were to speculate, I might say it has something to do with a new functionality that Google wants for the + symbol. In fact, it may have something to do with Google's new social network, Google+.

After all, to tag people in Google+ posts you currently put the + symbol in front of their name. Perhaps Google is working on a way to incorporate the Google+ social network into its search system, and therefore needed to get rid of the + operator's previous functionality. If that's the case, I'm not sure I like where this is going…

Follow Sarah on Twitter, Facebook, or Google+.

To comment on this article and other PCWorld content, visit our Facebook page or our Twitter feed.
Shop Tech Products at Amazon
Notice to our Readers
We're now using social media to take your comments and feedback. Learn more about this here.