- Recommend:
- 0 Comments
Will HailStorm Shower Money on Microsoft?
Software giant is banking on users' being willing to pay for its new Web services.
As with any new business venture, a key question surrounding Microsoft's HailStorm initiative is how the software giant will make money by pushing the Web services strategy.
Bob Muglia, vice president of Microsoft's .Net Services group, says current market conditions indicated that it was time to forego dot-com business strategies in favor of "traditional" models.
To that end, Microsoft will charge end users--both consumers and corporate users--on a subscription basis, a model the Redmond, Washington, company has been eyeing for years.
"We think that users will be willing to pay for those services," Muglia says.
Some base-level Internet services would remain free "even though that business model, by itself, has proven to be troublesome," jokes Microsoft Chair Bill Gates. One such free service will be Passport, the universal sign-on service that has been a staple of MSN and other Web sites run by or partnered with Microsoft.
Other HailStorm services, though, would come with a price, based on the richness of the features or the frequency of use. The cost could rise based on the number of notifications a user receives, says Brian Arbogast, vice president of Microsoft's personal services division.
Also factored in will be subscription-based updates to software such as the Office productivity suite, Muglia says.
One financial analyst, Rick Sherlund, who works at New York-based Goldman Sachs, says Microsoft likely will not see serious revenue from the Web services model until 2003, but unveiling the new direction "will be of strategic interest to investors" concerned about the company's vision.
"I would not be surprised to see some services as low as $3 per month," Sherlund says.
Gates agrees that users are not wary of Internet-based subscription models, noting that most of Microsoft's revenues come from the company's Enterprise agreements with large corporations, which are typically offered in three-year subscriptions.
Potentially more lucrative than end-user subscriptions is exploiting Web services in the business-to-business market--a market Microsoft plans to hit, although to date its .Net strategy has been primarily aimed at consumers.
Muglia says Microsoft could charge partners "a moderate amount" to be Web service operators, with additional charges for support, large volumes, and other factors.
"We think it would be less expensive to use our services than it would be to build their own," Muglia says.
For more IT analysis and commentary on emerging technologies, visit InfoWorld.com. Story copyright © 2011 InfoWorld Media Group. All rights reserved.
Would you recommend this story? YES NO
- Recommend:
- 0 Comments
-
ThinkPad Edge E420 Lenovo Style in an Affordable Package
Buy now direct from Lenovo -
ThinkPad X220 Fast and light, with great input ergonomics and battery life, this powerhouse ultraportable is best-of-breed.
Buy now direct from Lenovo -
ThinkPad X120e One of the best netbooks ever, X120e has the best netbook keyboard ever--nothing else comes close
Buy now direct from Lenovo
- Choose the Best Bank for Your Tech-Savvy Business: 8 Banks Compared
- Microsoft Office 365's Back-end Tools: No IT Pro Required
- Lync Is the Unsung Hero of Microsoft Office 365
- 11 Free Microsoft Tools You're Overlooking
- Quick Poll: How Does Your Company Use the Cloud?
- Office 365 Virtually Pays for Itself
- ICANN't Believe It: New Internet Rules Will Be a Mess
- 12 Criteria for Selecting the Best ERP System Replacement An ERP system is your information backbone and reaches into all areas of your business and value chain. Replacing it can open unlimited business opportunities. This white paper explains the 12 criteria that allow you to identify and select the solution that will meet these expectations.
- Leveraging Social Computing Technologies for ERP Applications This white paper details how Web 2.0 technologies support business strategies by improving efficiency, productivity, and collaboration.



















