Quantcast
PCWorld.com is upgrading some back-end systems. Some site features, such as user registration, may be temporarily unavailable.

Yahoo Case Tests Limits of Online Free Speech

Civil liberties groups fear decision in Yahoo Nazi memorabilia lawsuit could impose restrictions on Internet content worldwide.

Scarlet Pruitt, IDG News Service

  • 0 Yes
  • 0 No

Civil liberties groups continued to battle this week against a case that they say could potentially curtail free speech on the Net by imposing regional restrictions on global Internet content.

The Center for Democracy and Technology, the American Civil Liberties Union, and a handful of other rights organizations filed a friend-of-the-court brief Monday, asking a California court to deny an appeal in a 2-year-old case between Internet powerhouse Yahoo and two French nonprofit groups dedicated to eliminating anti-Semitism.

The International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism and the Union of French Jewish Students originally took the Santa Clara, California, company to court in France, asking that the Internet behemoth be restricted from letting French citizens bid on Nazi memorabilia being auctioned on Web sites that the company hosts. In their case, the groups cited a French law that makes it illegal to exhibit or sell objects with racist overtones.

Legal History

In November 2000, the French court ordered Yahoo to prevent local users from linking to Web sites with Nazi memorabilia. Yahoo then brought the case to its home state, asking the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, in San Jose, for a summary judgment against the order. Last November the court granted Yahoo the judgment, claiming that the French had no grounds for regulating constitutionally protected free speech.

Shortly after the court's verdict, the French parties filed an appeal on technical grounds, claiming that the California court did not have jurisdiction over the case.

John Morris, staff counsel for the CDT, calls the plaintiffs' claim that a French court could address a U.S.-based company but that a U.S. court couldn't get involved in the situation "extreme."

"Besides, their appeals papers are absolutely silent on the substantive ruling," Morris says, referring to the California court's finding that Yahoo was protected under First Amendment free speech rights.

The case is being lodged against Yahoo's U.S. subsidiary, since the company's French division already complies with local French law, Morris explains. The U.S. division should be wholly protected by the Constitution's free speech rights, he says.

Setting a Precedent

Civil liberties groups fear that it the appeal is won, the case will set a precedent that allows for local laws to stifle global online speech.

"To open the door to foreign restrictions on U.S. speakers [by] even the slightest crack would allow numerous restrictions on speech that would never be permitted if initiated in this country and would undermine First Amendment protections to Internet speech," the groups wrote in their friend-of-the-court brief.

The suit is just one of a recent spate of jurisdictional disputes over online content. The California Supreme Court, for example, is currently pondering a case in which an Indiana resident was sued in California for publishing code on how to circumvent DVD encryption online.

The defendant, Matthew Pavlovich, was sued by the DVD Copy Control Association for violating California state law governing trade secrets. Although Pavlovich was a student in Indiana when he published the code, the DVD CCA said that it filed suit in California because that is where the entertainment industry, which has the most to lose from the circumvention of DVD encryption, is based.

These and similar cases are testing the Net's status as a global free speech medium.

Although the Yahoo case will not be decided upon for some time, as the court is still in the process of collecting briefs, free speech activists are watching the case closely in an effort to determine which way the tide is heading.

"This case is very, very important," says Morris. "If what the French court did was upheld, U.S. companies would have to look to comply to the censorship laws of 200 countries around the world. It would be an untenable situation."

  • Recommend this story?
  • 0 Yes
    0 No
  • Great year-end deals for small business!
  • Get 24/7 live remote AT&T Tech Support 360* service along with select Lenovo* PCs (with Intel® Core™ 2 Duo processors and save up to 200!

    Learn more

  • HP EliteBook* 6930p Notebook with Intel® vPro™ technology and a free HP Basic Docking Station - $641 instant savings!

    Learn more

People who read this also read:

Sponsored Links