Quantcast

Supreme Court Ends Baby Bell Antitrust Suit

The U.S. Supreme Court said that similar practices by local telecoms did not constitute monopolistic activity, ending antitrust suit

Steven Schwankert, IDG News Service

  • 0 Yes
  • 0 No

The U.S. Supreme Court Monday said that similar business practices by local telephone companies did not constitute monopolistic activity, ending an antitrust lawsuit.

In its opinion on Twombly v. Bell Atlantic Corp.ultimatley means that , the Court ruled that although companies may be acting in parallel--that is, using seemingly similar business practices or tactics, such as pricing--there must be further factual evidence to indicate that they were actively working to restrict competition.

"While a showing of parallel 'business behavior is admissible circumstantial evidence from which' agreement may be inferred, it falls short of 'conclusively establish[ing] agreement or...itself constitut[ing] a Sherman Act offense."

The decision means that the Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILOC) -- often referred to as "Baby Bells" -- were not found to have colluded to prevent new players from entering local markets.

The Court voted 7-2, with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens dissenting. Justice David Souter wrote the majority opinion.

The case was filed as a class-action suit in 2002, with William Twombly as a the lead plaintiff, alleging that Bell Atlantic Corp. -- now part of Verizon Communications Inc. -- and other ILOCs neither offered sufficient, U.S. Federal Communications Commission-mandated assistance to new entrants, nor engaged in active competition.

A federal court dismissed the case as being insufficient to charge monopolistic activity. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the lower court's judgment in October 2005 and remanded it to the lower court. The plaintiffs then appealed to the Supreme Court, which accepted the case in June 2006.

In 1984, the breakup of Bell Telephone and divestiture of American Telephone & Telegraph Co. from long-distance voice service markets left the U.S. with several regional monopoly carriers offering local service that were prevented from participating in the long-distance market. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 stripped their monopoly service but allowed them to once again offer long-distance service.

  • Recommend this story?
  • 0 Yes
    0 No

"Supreme Court Ends Baby Bell Antitrust Suit" Comments

Related Tech Industry Articles

  • Microsoft Bolsters Ruby Efforts Company unveiling initiatives accommodating popular language.
  • SharePoint Helps Insurer Avoid Risks Allied North America, an insurer for construction firms, says its customer portal built using Microsoft SharePoint helps track construction site activities and analyze data to reduce risks for its clients.
  • Three Keys to Getting Projects Under Control, Part 2 Idea clarity is key: Know exactly what you are trying to accomplish. You know you "have an idea" when you can answer the questions Where are you going? How are you going to get there? What will it cost? What is the payoff?
  • 14 Common Project Management Mistakes Nearly 70 percent of IT projects are dogged by cost-overruns or aren't completed on schedule due to poor planning, poor communication or poor resource allocation. This story assess the impact of the 14 most common project management mistakes and offers ways IT groups can avoid them.
  • Smart Robots Will Explore Universe by 2020 Much like the probe in The Empire Strikes Back, smart bots will find and send info back to Earth.
  • CDW Virtualization Center What is Virtualization and how can it help you save money? Click here to find out.
  • Cisco Small Business Center Does your network give your business an advantage. Click here to find out...
  • HP Ink Center Bring improved color and brilliance to your printed material. Visit the Resource Center for more info...

PC World's Marketplace

PC World's Free Whitepapers

Name City
Address 1 State Zip
Address 2 E-mail (optional)