A recent patent filing indicates that Apple is getting closer to adding its own instant messaging client to the iPhone.
The filing is titled "Portable Electronic Device for Instant Messaging ", and covers methods for sending, receiving, and viewing ongoing conversations. The proposed GUI is similar to Apple's current interface for SMS.
Built-in support for IM has been missing from the iPhone, to the dismay of many users. The patent filing shows Apple has IM on its mind.
At the recent launch of the iPhone SDK, AOL demonstrated an AOL Instant Messenger client, but it isn't allowed to run in the background, which normal IM applications rely on.
Support for IM is quickly becoming a must on mobile phones. Users want the same thing on their mobile phone as they have on their computers including IM, according to Leif-Olof Wallin, research vice president at Gartner.
"It will be a blockbuster in two, three years," said Wallin.
But instant messaging is also a threat to the massive amounts mobile carriers make from SMS messaging, which the iPhone currently supports.
"They can charge much more for SMS compared to IM," said Wallin.
Pressure from its carrier partners is a possible explanation for why Apple has taken a hands-off approach to a feature many users want, according to Wallin.
"At the same time it can't afford to be left behind" he said.
- Sponsored Resource:Are you ready for virtualization? Try the sever assessment tool.
- Sponsored Resource:Learn more about ultra light notebooks from Asus and the best warranty in the industry.
- Sponsored Resource:Thinking about a new Laptop? Lenovo has models to meet everyone's needs.
- Sponsored Resource:Get the truth about remanufactured ink. Learn more from HP.
- Sponsored Resource:Six smart ways to grow small business IT
News For Your Business
- More Cores, Bigger Cache Give Boost to Dunnington
- Intel Confirms OQO to Use Atom in Handheld PC
- Singapore Gets IPhone, but No Visual Voicemail or ITunes
- Intel's Classmate 3 Laptop Gets a Touch Screen
- Apple's MobileMe Lacks Key Security Feature
Community Comments