<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
	<channel>
		<title>PCWorld</title>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:39:51 -0700</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:39:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
	<title>Lawmakers pledge to change hacking law during Swartz memorial</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>U.S. lawmakers pledged to rewrite an antihacking law as hundreds of people gathered in Washington, D.C., to mourn the death of Internet activist and innovator Aaron Swartz.
</p>
<p>Speakers at a Monday memorial service for Swartz, who <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2025165/hactivist-internet-innovator-aaron-swartz-commits-suicide.html">committed suicide in January</a>, remembered him as an intensely curious young man who wanted to help people and change the world. The world is a "worse place" because of Swartz's death, said his girlfriend, Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman.
</p>
<p>Swartz was "one of the brightest stars in America," Stinebrickner-Kauffman said. "He had so much more to do."
</p>
<p>As a teenager, Swartz played key roles in the development of the RSS online content syndication technology, in the creation of the Creative Commons licenses and in the founding of the Reddit news sharing site. He later cofounded Demand Progress, a left-leaning activist group focused on technology policy and other issues.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2027149/lawmakers-pledge-to-change-hacking-law-during-swartz-memorial.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2027149/lawmakers-pledge-to-change-hacking-law-during-swartz-memorial.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2013/02/aaron_swartz-100024326-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2013/02/aaron_swartz-100024326-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 04:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Grant Gross, IDG News Service</author>
</item><item>
	<title>A road warrior&#039;s guide to locking down your laptop</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Mobile computing may be convenient, but it's also inherently risky. When you drag your laptop to the coffee shop or bring it along on your travels, you’re making all your private data and one of your most expensive possessions a big, fat target for sticky-fingered thieves. And unlike traditional theft targets like jewelry or wallets, a laptop is an easy steal—the baddies just need to wait for you to turn your back, then grab the computer and run. In some cases, a criminal doesn’t even need to steal your notebook. He can simply pull your sensitive data out of thin air.
</p>
<p>Fortunately, you can do a lot to minimize the perils possibly encountered on the road. By taking a few simple precautions and following some common-sense practices while you’re out and about, you can drastically reduce the chance that your laptop will be stolen and keep your data locked up tight. With great portability brings great responsibility!
</p><h2>Lock the front door</h2>
<figure class=" large"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2013/01/change-user-password-100022484-large.png" border="0" alt="" width="580" height="249"/><figcaption>Creating a Windows login password is a snap.</figcaption></figure>
<p>When you go on a vacation, you wouldn’t leave your front door unlocked, would you? Of course not. You shouldn’t leave your laptop completely defenseless, either. Lock your laptop's proverbial front door by making sure that your Windows user account is set up to require a password on log-in. A log-in password won’t protect against an even semi-competent hacker, but it could easily be enough to dissuade unsophisticated criminals from snooping through your files after stealing your laptop.
</p>
<p>Windows makes it very easy to change your password or to set one if you don’t already have one. In Windows 7, just hit <strong>ctrl-alt-del</strong> and select Change Password, the fourth option down. After that's set, head to the Power Options in the Control Panel, click <strong>Require a password on wakeup</strong> in the left-hand pane, and click the radio button next to <strong>Require a password. </strong>
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2025897/a-road-warriors-guide-to-locking-down-your-laptop.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2025897/a-road-warriors-guide-to-locking-down-your-laptop.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt4.staticworld.net/images/article/2013/01/protect_homepage-11375867-100022489-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt4.staticworld.net/images/article/2013/01/protect_homepage-11375867-100022489-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 03:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Alex Castle</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Firefox turns 8 and gets a key security boost</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Between Android and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2012889/mozilla-unveils-the-firefox-marketplace-and-facebook-integration.html">Firefox</a>, this has been a big week for milestones in the world of free and open source software.
</p><figure class="right medium"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/10/firefox_ico-100008200-medium.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="300" height="155"/><figcaption/></figure>
<p>First, on Monday, we had <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013557/android-turns-5-today-hits-75-percent-of-the-smartphone-market.html">Android's fifth birthday</a>--accompanied by news that Google's Linux-based mobile operating platform attained a market share of 75 percent of smartphone shipments for the third quarter.
</p>
<p>Then, on Friday, it was Firefox's eighth birthday.
</p>
<p><strong>'Openness and interoperability'</strong>
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2013767/firefox-turns-8-and-gets-a-key-security-boost.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013767/firefox-turns-8-and-gets-a-key-security-boost.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/11/firefox20turns20-100012365-small.png"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/11/firefox20turns20-100012365-small.png"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Katherine Noyes</author>
</item><item>
	<title>What you should know about MIcrosoft&#039;s new BitLocker Management</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Encryption can be a bit of a double-edged sword for organizations. It is an effective and essential tool for protecting sensitive data, but it often comes with a healthy side of user confusion and help desk calls. Microsoft hopes to simplify the process of implementing and managing <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013248/10-essential-ingredients-of-a-killer-windows-8-business-pc.html">BitLocker data encryption</a> with the launch of Microsoft BitLocker Administration and Management (MBAM) 2.0 Beta 2.
</p>
<p>A <a href="http://blogs.windows.com/windows/b/business/archive/2012/11/06/announcing-microsoft-bitlocker-administration-and-monitoring-mbam-2-0-beta-2.aspx">Windows for Your Business blog post</a> announcing MBAM 2.0 Beta 2 points out that many states have data breach legislation in place, and that the penalties associated with failing to protect data can get quite costly. “I think this proves that the rules and stakes for data security are rapidly changing and there couldn’t be a more important time to ensure your understanding of data breach laws, and protect your corporate and customer data from the ramifications of a potential breach.”
</p>
<p>BitLocker encryption has been around in some form or another since the launch of Windows Vista. It is an effective means of protecting data, but can be a major headache to manage—especially for small and medium businesses that generally have fewer dedicated IT resources.
</p>
<p>MBAM 2.0 is part of the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/253262/microsoft_ue_v_takes_virtualization_to_the_next_level.html#tk.hp_new">Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack</a>. The new versions builds on MBAM 1.0 in an effort to streamline provisioning of BitLocker encryption, reduce support calls and costs, simplify management, and improve compliance reporting.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2013621/what-you-should-know-about-microsoft-bitlocker-administration-and-management-mbam-2-0.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013621/what-you-should-know-about-microsoft-bitlocker-administration-and-management-mbam-2-0.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/howto/graphics/182917-bitlocker_original.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/howto/graphics/182917-bitlocker_original.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:32:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Review: DiskCryptor a worthwhile encryption program that&#039;s easy to use</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
DiskCryptor (free) is a handy encryption program—simple, to the point, and lightweight.
</p>
<p>
My preference is to encrypt entire drives and partitions, which is the level at which I organize my data these days, and that's exactly what DiskCryptor does—even with your system partition. The program takes that one further and will encrypt ISO files that you may then burn to CD. If you need encrypted container files, look to TrueCrypt or others.
</p>
<p>
After you install DiskCryptor, it runs as a service in the background with an icon in the system tray. You can set it up to load from your boot sector if you've encrypted your system drive. Click on the system tray icon and you're presented with a plain, down-to-business dialog from which you encrypt/decrypt (AES 256, Two-fish, Serpent) as well as mount and unmount encrypted drives. The program uses only a little over 1MB of disk space installed.
</p>
<figure class=" original"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/10/dcrypt12-58-100010359-orig.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="580" height="380"/><figcaption>You couldn't get more business-like than DiskCryptor's interface.</figcaption></figure>
<p>
There are a few peculiarities with DiskCryptor that you should be aware of. When you unmount an encrypted drive, it's still visible to the system, as well as Windows Disk management, but isn't recognized as a validly formatted or partitioned drive. This could lead someone to think the drive is corrupt and repartition or reformat it—a hide drive function would be nice. It would also be nice to have context menu support so you don't have to go through the dialog for everything. But that's a lot of complaining for a program that's free, easy, convenient, and works extremely well.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2012853/review-diskcryptor-a-worthwhile-encryption-program-thats-easy-to-use.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2012853/review-diskcryptor-a-worthwhile-encryption-program-thats-easy-to-use.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/dcrypt13-58-100010358-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/dcrypt13-58-100010358-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Jon L. Jacobi</author>
</item><item>
	<title>How to encrypt your cloud storage for free</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
If you want something done right, do it yourself. That may sound trite, but it rings true as advice for securing files that you've stored online. Several recent incidents—including breaches of <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/260176/dropbox_blames_employee_account_breach_for_spam_attack.html" target="_self">Dropbox</a> and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/260414/how_did_apple_allow_hackers_to_access_icloud_account_.html" target="_self">iCloud</a>—underscore the fact that, even with built-in encryption and SSL transfers, cloud storage providers can't perfectly ensure the safety of your data.
</p>
<p>
Luckily, you can take cloud security into your own hands.
</p>
<p>
A few different tools can help safeguard the privacy of your data when you store it on a remote server. One of our favorites is <a href="https://www.boxcryptor.com/" target="_self">BoxCryptor</a>, an easy-to-use encryption program that works with all of the most popular cloud services, is free to use (though you can pay for upgrades), and helps keep your data safe.
</p>
<p>
BoxCryptor is basically a virtual hard disk that encrypts files on the fly using 256-bit AES encryption. Unlike <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/242612/how_to_use_truecrypt_to_encrypt_your_sensitive_documents.html" target="_self">TrueCrypt</a>, another popular on-the-fly encryption tool, BoxCryptor encrypts individual files, not an entire volume or container. Consequently, your BoxCryptor-encrypted files sync with your cloud storage service immediately after you save them, whereas TrueCrypt syncing occurs only after you finish encrypting an entire volume.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2010296/how-to-encrypt-your-cloud-storage-for-free.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010296/how-to-encrypt-your-cloud-storage-for-free.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt3.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/lockcldstorage_primary_v-100005328-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt3.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/lockcldstorage_primary_v-100005328-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Brad Chacos</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Safely send private information over the Internet</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p><em>KenWid10 asked the </em><a href="http://forums.pcworld.com/index.php?/forum/2018-antivirus-security-software/"><em>Antivirus &amp; Security Software</em></a><em> forum how best to send encrypted information to someone over the Internet.</em>
</p>
<p>You should never, ever just email credit card numbers, passwords, or other private information. You don't know how many servers the message will pass through between your computer and the recipient's, or who has access to those servers. Email is only slightly more private than a billboard. (A slight exaggeration, but you get the point.)
</p>
<p>A truly private message must be encrypted before it leaves your computer, and remain encrypted until the recipient receives it. To complicate things further, you can't assume that the recipient is any more tech savvy than that uncle who freaks out when you open a new tab on his browser.
</p>
<p>Here are two ways to safely send private information over the Internet:
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/262326/safely_send_private_information_over_the_internet.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/262326/safely_send_private_information_over_the_internet.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/email_internet_securit-100004070-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/email_internet_securit-100004070-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Lincoln-Spector/">Lincoln Spector</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Get ready: Microsoft is raising the bar for encryption keys</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Great news! Next Tuesday is already Patch Tuesday for September, but Microsoft only has a <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-sep">couple of relatively minor updates</a> lined up. Don’t get too comfortable, though—you need to prepare for the changes Microsoft is making next month for cryptographic keys.</p>
<p>Let’s start with Patch Tuesday. September is a dramatic departure from previous months. Unlike the many months that have been <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/260869/microsoft_and_adobe_keep_it_busy_with_critical_security_patches.html">loaded down with multiple Critical updates</a>, or the fact that Internet Explorer has been updated monthly for the past few months, Microsoft only has two security bulletins scheduled for this month.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/212534-code_binary_180_original.jpg" title="">Microsoft will soon consider any cryptographic key less than 1024 bits invalid.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/212534-code_binary_180_original.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>The last couple of months have each had nine new security bulletins, and the average per month through August is 7.5. Two is a manageable number that will make many IT admins very happy. Throw in the fact that both of the security bulletins are rated as Important, and that they impact software or platforms that many businesses don’t even use, and some IT admins may essentially get this Patch Tuesday off free and clear.</p>
<p>Of course, many IT admins are still trying to catch up from previous months, and can use the break to finish deploying the patches they already have. Then, there’s the Java patch from Oracle that probably needs urgent attention if you haven’t already implemented it.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261986/get_ready_microsoft_is_raising_the_bar_for_encryption_keys.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261986/get_ready_microsoft_is_raising_the_bar_for_encryption_keys.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/patch-windows-thumb180-11333384.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/patch-windows-thumb180-11333384.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Does the Windows logon password protect your data?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
<em><figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/050720thumb-11353023.jpg" alt="" height="119" width="180"/></figure>After discovering how easy it is to recover data from a hard drive removed from one PC and attached to another, Melker asked the </em><a href="http://forums.pcworld.com/index.php?/forum/2058-hard-drives-nas-drives-storage/"><em>Hard Drives, NAS Drives, Storage</em></a><em> forum if password protecting Windows actually protects your data.</em>
</p>
<p>
Your Windows logon password--the one you type every time you boot--does not protect your files in any meaningful way. (There's an exception, which I'll discuss below.)
</p>
<p>
<figure class="image right medium"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/08/090620logon-11403237.jpg" alt="" height="284" width="302"/></figure>The logon password isn't intended to protect your files. It's intended to keep others from logging onto your computer <em>as you.</em>
</p>
<p>
Why is that important? Because you do things on your computer that only you should be allowed to do, such as read and write your email. Unless you've set up your mail client to require a password every time you boot, anyone who can log onto your computer as you has full access to your mail.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261754/does_the_windows_logon_password_protect_your_data_.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261754/does_the_windows_logon_password_protect_your_data_.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/password_606-11387690.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/password_606-11387690.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 07:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Lincoln-Spector/">Lincoln Spector</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Shamoon Malware Cripples Windows PCs to Cover Tracks</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p><figure class="image large"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/trojan_pc-11376727.jpg" alt="" height="406" width="606"/></figure>A new Trojan horse tries to covers its tracks by crippling the victim's computer after stealing data, a security researcher said today.</p>
<p>Dubbed "Shamoon" by most antivirus companies, the malware has been used in targeted attacks aimed at specific individuals or firms, including at least one in the energy sector.</p>
<p>According to Israeli security company Seculert, Shamoon relies on a one-two punch, first taking control of a system connected to the Internet before spreading to other PCs on an organization's network.</p>
<p>The second stage -- which kicks off after the malware has done its dirty work -- overwrites files and the Master Boot Record (MBR) of the machine. The latter makes the PC unbootable.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261092/shamoon_malware_cripples_windows_pcs_to_cover_tracks.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261092/shamoon_malware_cripples_windows_pcs_to_cover_tracks.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/trojan1-11376746.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/trojan1-11376746.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 07:09:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Gregg-Keizer/">Gregg Keizer</a>, Computerworld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>New Standard Pushes for a More Secure Web</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>There is no silver bullet when it comes to encryption. Even the most complex, invulnerable encryption today could be child’s play in the future. The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) is <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/260922/new_nist_encryption_guidelines_may_force_federal_agencies_to_replace_old_websites.html">publishing new encryption standards</a> for public review to try and keep up with the times and stay a step ahead of the bad guys.</p>
<p><figure class="image right medium"><a class="zoomLink" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/secure_browser-11351369.jpg" title="" target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/secure_browser-11351369.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>The NIST is a government agency, and its guidelines only really impact other government agencies. However, many security experts and organizations look to the NIST standards as a baseline.</p>
<p>All of security is more or less a game of cat and mouse. Security measures are put in place, and they work for a while until attackers find the weak spots, or figure out how to compromise or circumvent them. Then, security experts have to devise new methods, and the game starts over. Website encryption, and the certificates we use to prove a site is legitimate, are subject to this same cause and effect.</p>
<p>Secure websites <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/250310/mozilla_gives_cas_a_chance_to_come_clean_about_certificate_policy_violations.html">rely on digital certificates</a> issued by trusted Certificate Authorities (CA) to verify their authenticity. Basically, a trusted third-party acts as a Certificate Authority (CA). The CA validates that an individual or organization is authentic, and issues a certificate. When you connect to a website, your browser verifies that the site has a valid certificate issued from a trusted CA, and in most cases will warn you if the certificate is expired or has other issues.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260934/new_standard_pushes_for_a_more_secure_web.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260934/new_standard_pushes_for_a_more_secure_web.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/secure_browser-11351369.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/secure_browser-11351369.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Charles-Ripley/">Charles Ripley</a>, IDG Creative Lab</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Privacy Watch: Back Up Safely With SpiderOak</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Every backup service worth its salt uses encryption to keep your data safe from snoops, but <a href="/downloads/file/fid,77841/description.html">Spider­Oak</a> goes one step further by promising to keep your data private from its own employees. Although you still should use common sense in choosing what to upload to any service, I believe that SpiderOak is one of the best secure <a href="/article/259729/top_cloud_services_for_online_backup.html">online backup</a> options available.</p>
<p><figure class="image left medium"><a class="zoomLink" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/spideroak-11391619.jpg" title="" target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/spideroak-11391619.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>You may store up to 2GB on a free account; extra space costs $10 per month or $100 per year per 100GB (cheaper than <a href="/article/259715/top_cloud_services_for_file_sharing_and_syncing.html">Dropbox</a> but a bit pricier than Mozy).</p>
<p>You download an application (for Windows, Mac, or Linux) that coordinates which files and folders to back up, and runs in the background to sync your online backup with your PC. The password that you create never goes to the SpiderOak servers; it’s stored on your PC. Your password then serves to generate a pair of encryption keys, which also remain local. The keys work to encrypt your files on your PC before the data goes to the SpiderOak servers—without your password or keys, no one can view your data without cracking the encryption via brute force.</p>
<h3 class="subhed">‘Zero-Knowledge’ Privacy Policy</h3>
<p>This hands-off approach means that every time you log in to SpiderOak, you’re just verifying your identity to the desktop client, which in turn establishes a se­­cure connection to the SpiderOak servers. As long as you never log in via SpiderOak’s website or a mobile device (in addition to the desktop tools, SpiderOak offers mobile and Web clients for convenience), your password will never enter SpiderOak servers, so theoretically it’s difficult for a SpiderOak staffer to peek at your data or give it to a third party.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260110/back_up_safely_with_spideroak.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260110/back_up_safely_with_spideroak.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/spideroak_180-11391618.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/spideroak_180-11391618.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 18:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Alex-Wawro/">Alex Wawro</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Tools Released at Defcon Can Crack Widely Used PPTP Encryption</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>
Security researchers released two tools at the Defcon security conference that can be used to crack the encryption of any PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) and WPA2-Enterprise (Wireless Protected Access) sessions that use MS-CHAPv2 for authentication.
</p>
<p>
MS-CHAPv2 is an authentication protocol created by Microsoft and introduced in Windows NT 4.0 SP4. Despite its age, it is still used as the primary authentication mechanism by most PPTP virtual private network (VPN) clients.
</p>
<p>
MS-CHAPv2 has been known to be vulnerable to dictionary-based brute force attacks since 1999, when a cryptanalysis of the protocol was published by <a id="" title=""/> and other researchers.
</p>
<p>
However, the common belief on the Internet is that if you have a strong password then it's OK, said Moxie Marlinspike, the security researcher who developed <a href="https://github.com/moxie0/chapcrack">ChapCrack</a>, one of the tools released at Defcon. "What we demonstrated is that it doesn't matter. There's nothing you can do."
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260012/tools_released_at_defcon_can_crack_widely_used_pptp_encryption_in_under_a_day.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260012/tools_released_at_defcon_can_crack_widely_used_pptp_encryption_in_under_a_day.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/defcon-2012-logo-thumb18020-20copy-11390597.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/defcon-2012-logo-thumb18020-20copy-11390597.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Lucian-Constantin/">Lucian Constantin</a>, IDG News Service</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Password Protection 101: Lessons From the eHarmony Data Breach </title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>
<figure class="image right medium"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/spy_password_hacker-5223066.jpg" alt="" height="234" width="350"/></figure>Last month the dating site eHarmony <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/257104/dating_site_eharmony_confirms_password_breach.html?tk=rel_news">suffered a data breach</a> in which more than 1.5 million eHarmony password hashes were stolen and later dumped online by the hacker gang called Doomsday Preppers. The crypto-based "hashing" process is supposed to conceal stored passwords, but Trustwave's SpiderLabs division says eHarmony could have done this process a lot better because it only took 72 hours to crack about 80 percent of 1.5 million eHarmony hashed passwords that were dumped.
</p>
<p>
Cracking the dumped eHarmony passwords wasn't too hard, says Mike Kelly, <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/topics/security.html">security</a> analyst at SpiderLabs, which used tools such as oclHashcat and John the Ripper. In fact, he says it was one of the "easiest" challenges he ever faced. There are many reasons why this is so, starting with the fact the cracked passwords may have been "hashed," but they weren't "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_(cryptography)">salted</a>," which he says "would drastically increase the time it would take to crack them."
</p>
<p>
BACKGROUND: <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/060712-dating-site-eharmony-confirms-password-259947.html">Dating site eHarmony confirms password breach</a>
</p>
<p>
He points out that hashing the passwords with a crypto algorithm is a good start to scramble the password, but by adding the "salt" of a random string in the process, <a href="http://www.developerfusion.com/article/4679/you-want-salt-with-that/3/">the "salted hash" is far stronger protection</a>. eHarmony was also using the MD5 format, which is considered somewhat weak by cryptographers today, Kelly adds.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/258941/password_protection_101_lessons_from_the_eharmony_data_breach.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/258941/password_protection_101_lessons_from_the_eharmony_data_breach.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/hacker_thumb180-5179696.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/hacker_thumb180-5179696.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Ellen-Messmer/">Ellen Messmer</a>, NetworkWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Password Protect a Flash Drive</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p><em><figure class="image left small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/07r_flashopener-11363343.jpg" alt="" height="121" width="180"/></figure>Enddylopez asked the </em><a href="http://forums.pcworld.com/index.php?/forum/2058-hard-drives-nas-drives-storage/"><em>Hard Drives, NAS Drives, Storage</em></a><em> forum about password protecting a flash drive.</em></p>
<p>If a flash drive contains sensitive information--such as bank account statements, credit card numbers, or your own unique, brilliant plans for world domination--you should password protect, if not the whole drive, than at least those particular files.</p>
<p>You've got two options for protecting data on a flash drive: You can use encryption software, or you can buy a special, encrypted flash drive.</p>
<p>Jon L. Jacobi recently wrote <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/254816/the_best_encrypted_flash_drives.html">The Best Encrypted Flash Drives</a>, and recommended the Imation Defender<figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/07r_r1_imation-11363278.jpg" alt="Imation Defender F200 " height="121" width="180"/><figcaption class="caption">Imation Defender F200 </figcaption></figure> F200 as the top choice (although a pricey one). Jon considers an encrypted drive to be the most secure option, and argues that "a chip is harder to hack, and to reach it means actually tampering with the drive, which is easy to detect."</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/258305/password_protect_a_flash_drive.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/258305/password_protect_a_flash_drive.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/07r_flashopener-11363342.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/07r_flashopener-11363342.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Lincoln-Spector/">Lincoln Spector</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Encryption Is Not a Silver Bullet</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Secure data being beamed across the Internet it? Encrypt it. Protect data at rest from being accessed? Encrypt it. It seems like encryption is the answer to all of your security concerns. That’s true to an extent, but even <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/257554/linkedin_boosts_encryption_after_password_leak.html">encryption has its limitations</a>.</p>
<p>Encryption is a perfectly viable solution for securing data, but it’s not invulnerable--especially for data at rest, like files stored on backup media. Today’s unbreakable algorithm is tomorrow’s cracked encryption.</p>
<p>The idea of encryption dates back centuries. At its core, it’s nothing more than replacing information with other data that makes it appear to be gibberish unless you have the key that helps you reverse the process (decrypt) so you can recover the original information.</p>
<p>One of the most well-known examples of encryption is the <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CFYQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FCaesar_cipher&amp;ei=xhbrT8_ADNDW2wXj7tXZAQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNEGkKYsgzReVJDaHqkbhYf5B39_kQ&amp;sig2=c5e3uEVNniQiI6IG9-uaeQ">Caesar Cipher</a>. Attribute to the Roman emperor Julius Caesar, the code involved simply offsetting the letters of the alphabet by a specified number. For example, an offset of four would make an “A” become a “E”, a “B” become an “F”, and so on. The resulting message would seem like a random jumble of letters unless you knew how it was encrypted, and what the offset number was.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/258394/encryption_is_not_a_silver_bullet.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/258394/encryption_is_not_a_silver_bullet.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/David-Jeffers/">David Jeffers</a>, IDG Creative Lab</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Privacy Watch: Spotflux Guards Your Privacy for Free</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Keeping your data private while you’re browsing the Web can be time-consuming if you want to stop malware, IP-address snoopers, and malicious ads. Spotflux, a New York startup, is aiming to change that with a no-cost, easy-to-use program that encrypts your Internet connection, anonymizes your IP address, and reduces your risk of infection while you surf. Did I mention that it’s free?</p>
<p><figure class="image left medium"><a class="zoomLink" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/spotflux-11374152.jpg" title="" target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/spotflux-11374152.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>Spotflux works sort of like a faster, simpler version of the <a href="/article/235174/tor_network_cloaks_your_browsing_from_prying_eyes.html">Tor Network</a>, though it’s not nearly as stringent about ensuring your anonymity. You download the application for Windows or Mac OS X from the <a href="http://www.spotflux.com">Spotflux website</a> (iOS and Android apps are in development), and run it. Installation is easy, and you can set the app to access a proxy server for added safety (or to ensure that you can reach region-restricted sites after your IP address becomes anonymous). When you access the Net while the app is running, all data moving into or out of your PC shuttles through Spotflux servers by way of a 128-bit SSL encrypted connection; software on the servers scans the data for malware (including malicious ads), and eliminates it.</p>
<p>This requires a certain level of trust, since the Spotflux servers are privy to everything you do. The payoff is the assurance that your activities are anonymized and protected. While Spotflux is cagey about what it looks for when filtering traffic (lest the bad guys learn how to circumvent the filters), we do know that it regularly updates its servers to scan for widespread malware such as <a href="/article/255137/protect_yourself_from_dnschanger.html">DNSChanger</a>. “We scour the Web for major offenders, and listen to the users on Facebook and Twitter to find and eliminate major sources of malware,” claims Chris Naegelin, who cofounded Spotflux in Brooklyn, New York, along with Dean Mekkawy. And since Spotflux’s staff operates the Spotflux servers, the service can reasonably promise that no­­body outside the company can use it to snoop on you.</p>
<h3 class="subhed">Benefits and Drawbacks</h3>
<p>Since your traffic goes through the Spotflux servers twice (first when your browser sends a request, and again when a site responds), you will see a slight performance hit. I ran speed tests, and my download speed consistently degraded by roughly 20 percent while the app was running. The upside: I never saw an irritating ad during several days of browsing, and my antivirus scans came up clean despite my rampant downloading. Plus, according to AT&amp;T, my bandwidth usage was lower than ever during my weekend with Spotflux, which may be an unintended but wonderful consequence of filtering out unwanted ads.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/257831/spotflux_guards_your_privacy_for_free.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/257831/spotflux_guards_your_privacy_for_free.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/spotflux_180-11374151.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/spotflux_180-11374151.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Alex-Wawro/">Alex Wawro</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Encryption Tips from WWII</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>
The Enigma cypher machine used by the German military in World War II is still a tough nut to crack today. The total number of ways it can be configured for every letter is around 150 million million million. That's enough to keep it beyond the reach of all but the most determined of brute force attacks.
</p>
<figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/174667-vintcerf_180.jpg" alt="" height="124" width="180"/><figcaption class="caption">Vint Cerf, Google evangelist</figcaption></figure><p>
MAIN ARTICLE: <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/061112-turing-260039.html">Tech world preps to honor 'Father of Computer Science' Alan Turing, as centenary nears</a>
</p>
<p>
IN PICTURES: <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/slideshow/51232">Alan Turing in the media</a>
</p>
<p>
So how were the late Alan Turing (whose 100th birthday is being celebrated in academic circles this June) and his fellow Bletchley Park code-breakers able to crack the Enigma and provide the Allies with such priceless intelligence?
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/257303/encryption_tips_from_wwii.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/257303/encryption_tips_from_wwii.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/215681-secure_drive_encrypt_180_original.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/215681-secure_drive_encrypt_180_original.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Jon Gold</author>
</item><item>
	<title>&#039;Flame&#039; Spread Via Rogue Microsoft Security Certificates</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Analysis of the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/256499/dont_get_burned_by_flame_malware_attack.html">massive ‘Flame’ cyber attack</a> code has revealed that rogue Microsoft security certificates were used to make the malware appear as if it was officially signed by Microsoft. Microsoft has issued a <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2718704">security advisory</a>, revoked trust in the rogue certificates, and provided steps to help IT admins and users prevent attacks that rely on the spoofed Microsoft certificates.</p>
<p>A post on the <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2012/06/03/microsoft-releases-security-advisory-2718704.aspx">Microsoft Security Response Center blog</a> states plainly, “We have discovered through our analysis that some components of the malware have been signed by certificates that allow software to appear as if it was produced by Microsoft.”</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/malware2_180-5186391.jpg" title="">'Flame' slipped under network defenses by appearing as legitimate Microsoft code.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/malware2_180-5186391.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>Andrew Storms, director of security operations for <a href="http://www.ncircle.com/">nCircle</a>, declares, “The discovery of a bug that’s been used to circumvent Microsoft’s secure code certificate hierarchy is a major breach of trust, and it’s a big deal for every Microsoft user. It also underscores the delicate and problematic nature of the trust models behind every Internet transaction.”</p>
<p>The Microsoft blog post explains that a vulnerability in an old cryptography algorithm is exploited by some <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/256508/the_flame_virus_your_faqs_answered.html">elements of Flame</a> to make them appear as if they originated from Microsoft. Most systems around the world accept officially-signed Microsoft code as safe by default, so the malware would enter unnoticed.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/256742/flame_spread_via_rogue_microsoft_security_certificates.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/256742/flame_spread_via_rogue_microsoft_security_certificates.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227404.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227404.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 07:38:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Recover Encrypted Files From An Old Hard Drive</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p><em><figure class="image left small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/050720thumb-11353023.jpg" alt="" height="119" width="180"/></figure>Jeff Hudgins removed the hard drive from a dying computer, and via USB plugged it into a new PC. But he can't access his files. They're encrypted.</em></p>
<p>I don't like Windows' Encrypted File System (EFS), and Jeff's story illustrates why. Although EFS provides what appears to be a convenient, completely transparent form of encryption, it can be trouble down the road.</p>
<p>EFS makes sense in a business, where IS professionals manage the computers and less savvy people use them. The users don't even have to know that their data is encrypted (or even what the word <em>encrypted </em>means). They log into Windows and they can access their files. But if someone else logs in, or boots from a live Linux CD, or removes the hard drive, the files are inaccessible. And should it be necessary, IS knows how to get back those files.</p>
<p>But in a home environment, as Jeff discovered, EFS is just asking for trouble down the road.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/254642/recover_encrypted_files_from_an_old_hard_drive.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/254642/recover_encrypted_files_from_an_old_hard_drive.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/050720thumb-11353023.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/050720thumb-11353023.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Lincoln-Spector/">Lincoln Spector</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>How to Encrypt Your Email</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p><figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/11/email_security_lock-5233228.jpg" alt="How To Encrypt Your Email" height="119" width="180"/></figure>Even if you never email sensitive information--social security numbers, banking info, business secrets, and so on--you should consider using encryption. Aside from capturing your email content and attachments, a miscreant could hijack your entire email account if you failed to secure it properly. In this article, I'll discuss what you need to encrypt and how to get started, regardless of the particular email service you use.</p>
<h3 class="subhed">What to Encrypt</h3>
<p>To secure your email effectively, you should encrypt three things: the connection from your email provider; your actual email messages; and your stored, cached, or archived email messages.</p>
<p>If you leave the connection from your email provider to your computer or other device unencrypted while you check or send email messages, other users on your network can easily capture your email login credentials and any messages you send or receive. This hazard typically arises when you use a public network (the Wi-Fi hotspot in a coffee shop, say), but an unencrypted connection can also be pose problems on your work or private network.</p>
<p>Your actual email messages are vulnerable as they travel over the Internet, after leaving your email provider's server. Bad guys can intercept a message as it bounces from server to server on the Internet. Encrypting your messages before sending them renders them unreadable from the point at which they embark on their journey to the point at which the intended recipient opens them.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/254338/how_to_encrypt_your_email.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/254338/how_to_encrypt_your_email.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/11/email_security_lock-5233228.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/11/email_security_lock-5233228.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Eric-Geier/">Eric Geier</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Why &#039;Bull Mountain&#039; Makes Ivy Bridge More Secure</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Intel pulled back the curtain this week to unveil a lineup of <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/254385/patiencewait_for_ivy_bridge_ultrabooks.html">new Ivy Bridge processors</a>. Most of the focus on the Ivy Bridge CPUs is on the faster performance, and more efficient power consumption. But, beneath the surface Intel has incorporated a feature that also makes <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/254261/13_quadcore_intel_ivy_bridge_chips_expected.html">Ivy Bridge</a> more secure than its predecessors--“Bull Mountain”.</p>
<p>Bull Mountain is the code name for Intel’s new random number generator technology. Why is that important? Random numbers are required for effective encryption, and weak random number generators are the Achilles heel of data security.</p>
<p>Encryption is a crucial element of computer and network security. Data is encrypted to prevent it from being accessed or viewed by unauthorized users. Traffic between a PC and a website is encrypted to ensure sensitive information like passwords or credit card information aren’t intercepted in transit.</p>
<p>The fatal flaw of encryption is that it relies on randomness to generate strong encryption keys, but computers aren’t random. The ones and zeros that bounce around the PC and across the Internet are fundamentally predictable. Granted, even weak encryption is enough to prevent data from being compromised in most cases, but skilled attackers can exploit a weak random number generator to <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/249242/verisign_hacked_what_we_dont_know_might_hurt_us.html">crack the encryption</a>.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/254454/why_bull_mountain_makes_ivy_bridge_more_secure.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/254454/why_bull_mountain_makes_ivy_bridge_more_secure.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:36:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Charles-Ripley/">Charles Ripley</a>, IDG Creative Lab</author>
</item><item>
	<title>For a Truly Private Social Network, Try RetroShare</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>It's a rare week indeed that doesn't bring forth some fresh <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/251579/got_privacy_ubuntu_linux_1204_will_help_ensure_it.html">privacy</a> scandal, and creepy apps like <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/252996/girls_around_me_app_voluntarily_pulled_after_privacy_backlash.html">Girls Around Me</a> are only one small part of the problem.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/retroshare20logo-11343489.jpg" alt="RetroShare" height="119" width="180"/></figure>Just between <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/253182/activists_allege_facebook_dragging_its_feet_on_privacy_changes.html">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/252782/new_google_account_activity_lets_you_know_what_google_knows_about_you.html">Google</a>, a world of data about us is increasingly available <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/252973/online_oversharing_can_be_dangerous.html">online</a> to pretty much anyone motivated enough to seek it out. If you communicate and spend time on the Internet, you have little choice but to accept a much lower level of privacy than you'd have otherwise--<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/249651/do_not_track_tool_promises_page_loads_up_to_four_times_faster.html">Do Not Track</a> and other recent measures notwithstanding.</p>
<p>I've already written about a few privacy-minded technologies that aim to help, including the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/251783/duckduckgo_search_engine_with_an_eye_for_privacy.html">DuckDuckGo</a> search engine, the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/222556/gnu_free_call_an_open_source_skype_alternative.html">GNU Free Call</a> alternative to Skype, the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/227838/free_browser_in_a_box_runs_firefox_4_with_ultra_security.html">BitBox</a> browser, and the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/236497/dod_debuts_a_brandnew_linux_for_telecommuters.html">Lightweight Portable Security (LPS)</a> Linux distribution.</p>
<p>Recently, however, a reader alerted me to a new and highly secure social networking option. It's called RetroShare, and it basically lets you set up a completely private network for communicating and sharing with those you trust.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/253205/for_a_truly_private_social_network_try_retroshare.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/253205/for_a_truly_private_social_network_try_retroshare.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/retroshare20logo-11343488.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/retroshare20logo-11343488.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:11:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Katherine-Noyes/">Katherine Noyes</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Email Encryption Made Free and Easy With Enlocked</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Like many people, I rely heavily on email to communicate with all sorts of folks. And sometimes, whether it's sending tax information to my husband or credit card information to the owner of an inn, that communication is sensitive. That's why I was intrigued by Enlocked (free beta), an email encryption service that's designed to take the complications out of complex encryption software. And it succeeds, to a certain extent.</p>
<p><figure class="image left medium"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/enlocked-jpg-11342800.jpg" alt="Enlocked screenshot" height="221" width="350"/><figcaption class="caption">Enlocked adds a "Send Secured" button to your email client, allowing you to encrypt messages with a single click.</figcaption></figure>Enlocked is available as a free plugin for the Outlook email client; <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,73097-order,4/description.html">Chrome</a>, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,23160-order,4/description.html">Firefox</a>, and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,157124-order,4/description.html">Internet Explorer</a> browsers; and Android and iOS mobile devices. I tested the IE plug-in. Once you download and install the appropriate plugin, Enlocked adds a new button to your email options: "Send Secured." I tested it using Gmail and Hotmail on Firefox and Internet Explorer, and found the Send Secured button easy to identify--when it appeared, that is. When using a Gmail account in IE, I discovered that the button didn't appear until I began typing an address into the "To" field, but it remained constant in a Hotmail account in the same browser. I also found that, on two separate occasions, the button disappeared completely, and didn't show up again until I reinstalled the plugin entirely. Enlocked is still in beta, so I'm hoping the company improves its stability before the final version is released.</p>
<p>Before you send your first encrypted email, Enlocked will ask you to enter you email password. This is done to authenticate the user, and the message only appears the first time you use the service. Once you click "Send Secured," emails are sent just as any other message would be. If the recipient has never before received an message that's been encrypted with Enlocked, they will receive a notification message before the encrypted message arrives. This message lets them know that, in order to read the encrypted message, they will need to download the free plugin and offers handy links to do so. (If their mail client and/or browser is not supported, or if they simply prefer not to download anything, Enlocked does offer a browser-based version, called Enlocked Anywhere, which allows messages to be read in a Web browser.)</p>
<p>If the recipient has downloaded and installed the Enlocked plugin by the time the message arrives, they'll be asked to enter their email password upon opening the message. This authenticates the user, and only happens upon receiving the first encrypted message. The contents of the message are then automatically decrypted.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/253111/enlocked.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/253111/enlocked.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/enlocked-jpg-180-11342799.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/enlocked-jpg-180-11342799.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Liane-Cassavoy/">Liane Cassavoy</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>New Key Technology Simplifies Data Encryption in the Cloud</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Data at rest has long been protected by technology called public key infrastructure (PKI), in which data is encrypted when it's created by a public key and only decrypted, in theory, by an authorized person holding the private key. But extending this type of data protection to the cloud can be complicated.</p>
<p><figure class="image large"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/02/link_clicks_security-11320225.jpg" alt="" height="406" width="606"/></figure>The migration to the cloud has introduced a new set of complex <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/topics/security.html">security</a> issues for IT teams to manage due to the lack of direct control over the security of the data. Moreover, cloud providers believe that data security is a shared responsibility, where the service provider assures physical security and the subscribers must secure their servers and data. Presumably this would include a strategy for encryption and key management which requires that the keys be stored outside the cloud rather than in it.</p>
<p>Startup security company <a href="http://www.porticor.com/">Porticor</a> just released a solution that addresses the concern about data at rest in the cloud. Porticor offers a split key encryption solution where the cloud customer is the only one who knows the master key. What's more, Porticor handles all the complexity of encrypting data so the customer barely needs to think about it. The security and convenience is all in the unique implementation of key management.</p>
<p>BACKGROUND: <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/021512-porticor-255998.html">Startup Porticor launches with encryption technology for cloud computing</a></p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/251623/new_key_technology_simplifies_data_encryption_in_the_cloud.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/251623/new_key_technology_simplifies_data_encryption_in_the_cloud.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/12/newart_cloud_clean-6314774.png"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/12/newart_cloud_clean-6314774.png"/>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:35:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Brian-Musthaler/">Brian Musthaler</a>, NetworkWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>48 NASA Laptops Stolen in Two Years: A Case for Better Encryption Practices</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>
<figure class="image right medium"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/international_space_station_wikimedia-11330945.jpg" title="">International Space Station: Image courtesy of Wikimedia</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/international_space_station_wikimedia-11330945.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>It's not only businesses that need to worry about laptop security.
</p>
<p>
Even NASA laptops are vulnerable to theft and poor security practices: 48 NASA laptops or mobile devices were stolen from America’s space agency between April 2009 and April 2011, including one--unencrypted--laptop containing control codes for the International Space Station (ISS).
</p>
<p>
Although ISS does not appear to be in jeopardy, according to a NASA public affairs officer who spoke to the <a href="http://www.securitynewsdaily.com/1581-stolen-nasa-laptop.html"><em>Security News Daily</em></a>, the NASA security breaches underscore how serious and difficult a problem laptop and mobile device theft is--whether you’re a government agency or a small business or an individual.
</p>
<p>
In his testimony last month before the Science, Space and Technology House subcommittee, <a href="http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/HHRG-112-SY21-WState-PMartin-20120229.pdf">NASA Inspector General Paul Martin</a> admitted that only 1 percent of NASA’s portable devices are encrypted. That leaves 99 percent of the agency’s laptops and mobile devices left unprotected, storing possibly not just employees’ personal data such as Social Security numbers, but also third-party intellectual property and perhaps space or government secrets (yes, I watched many episodes of <a href="http://www.nbc.com/chuck/"><em>Chuck</em></a>).
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/251318/48_nasa_laptops_stolen_in_two_years_a_case_for_better_encryption_practices.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/251318/48_nasa_laptops_stolen_in_two_years_a_case_for_better_encryption_practices.html#tk.rss_encryption</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/reviews/graphics/151346-generic_notebooks_original.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/reviews/graphics/151346-generic_notebooks_original.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Melanie-Pinola/">Melanie Pinola</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item></channel>
</rss>