<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
	<channel>
		<title>PCWorld</title>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:54:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:54:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
	<title>Don’t fall for the Facebook privacy notice hoax</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Have you posted the notice to your Facebook timeline to proclaim your copyright ownership of all content? Have you seen others from your social network posting such a notice? If you haven’t already, don’t bother. It’s a hoax.
</p>
<p>It’s not even a new hoax. It’s a resurgence of an old hoax that many users fell for earlier this year when Facebook became a publicly-traded company. The previous hoax implied that the change from a private company to a public one somehow changed the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/172604/protect_yourself_on_facebook_and_twitter.html">rules of the privacy agreement</a> and put your posts and photos at risk unless you posted a copy and paste of a disclaimer establishing your copyright ownership.
</p>
<p>
</p><figure class="left medium"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/09/facebook_thum-100006205-medium.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="300" height="201"/><figcaption>You can't change the Facebook legal terms by posting on your timeline.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The new one reads: “In response to the new Facebook guidelines I hereby declare that my copyright is attached to all of my personal details, illustrations, paintings, writing, publications, photos and videos, etc. (as a result of the Berne Convention).”
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2016911/don-t-fall-for-the-facebook-privacy-notice-hoax.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2016911/don-t-fall-for-the-facebook-privacy-notice-hoax.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt4.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/facebook_privacy-1133052-100005506-small.jpeg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt4.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/facebook_privacy-1133052-100005506-small.jpeg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:04:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>With shopping scams on the rise, watch for these threats</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
Tomorrow is Thanksgiving, which means only one thing—the glorious chaos we call the Holiday Shopping Season will soon be upon us. Holiday shopping also means a spike in online scams, fraud, and malware, so you need to be aware of the risks and threats, and exercise some common sense to avoid a cyber-Grinch incident.
</p>
<p>
Intrepid shoppers will <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2015504/10-best-black-friday-desktop-deals.html">line up for Black Friday deals</a> that have spilled over to Thanksgiving Thursday. You can now start your Black Friday shopping between the turkey feast and the pumpkin pie, before the football games are even over on Thanksgiving Day. The definition of “Friday” aside, holiday shopping will officially be underway. Black Friday will be followed by Cyber Monday, and many shoppers will turn to their mobile devices to find great deals, so it’s primetime for cybercriminals.
</p>
<figure class="right medium"><strong><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/09/security_phone-1133056-100005127-medium.jpeg" border="0" alt="" width="300" height="236"/><figcaption>Be careful what apps you install and what you click on from your mobile device.</figcaption></strong></figure>
<p>
<strong>Rising threat of mobile scams and malware</strong>
</p>
<p>
Black Friday is generally an in-person, brick-and-mortar-store shopping experience, but competition from online retailers and Cyber Monday, combined with the explosion of connected shoppers armed with mobile devices, has changed the game. A report from <a href="http://www.iovation.com/">iovation</a>, a mobile device security and reputation management company, claims that online retail transactions from mobile devices have increased 300 percent over last year. Mobile transactions accounted for nearly one in ten purchases in the most recent quarter, and that number is expected to spike up for holiday shopping.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2015565/shopping-scams-are-on-the-rise-threats-to-watch-for.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2015565/shopping-scams-are-on-the-rise-threats-to-watch-for.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/12/holiday_thumb-5244522.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/12/holiday_thumb-5244522.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>US teens lead the way for shady, risky online behavior</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>What does your teen do when he or she is online? <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/224773/do_you_know_what_your_kids_are_doing_online.html">Do you know</a>? Teens in general partake in riskier online behavior than your average user, but according to a recent study from McAfee—<a href="https://blogs.mcafee.com/consumer/exploring-the-digital-divide">Exploring the Digital Divide</a>—teens in the United States are even more likely to engage in shady online activities.
</p>
<p>The new report is a follow up to McAfee’s “<a href="http://www.mcafee.com/us/resources/misc/digital-divide-study.pdf">The Digital Divide: How the Online Behavior or Teens Is Getting Past Parents</a>”, released earlier this year. The original survey focused solely on the United States, but the new one expands the scope to include teens in European countries for comparison.
</p>
<p>The results might be a bit discouraging for parents of US teens. Teens in the United States lead in almost every category of shady online behavior. Nearly a third of US teens have used the Web to intentionally surf for porn. US teens also “lead” in using mobile devices to cheat on tests, and are tied for second in using the Internet as a platform for cyber bullying—only half a percentage point behind the Netherlands. Go USA?
</p>
<p>
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2015064/us-teens-lead-the-way-for-shady-risky-online-behavior.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2015064/us-teens-lead-the-way-for-shady-risky-online-behavior.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt2.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/11/scam_online_red_keyboar-100012446-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt2.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/11/scam_online_red_keyboar-100012446-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:35:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Here&#039;s how to secure your email and avoid becoming a ‘Petraeus’ </title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
It was a shock when David Petraeus—a respected and highly-decorated Army general—abruptly stepped down from his post as the director of the CIA earlier this week. It was even more of a jolt to learn that his resignation was due to an extramarital affair. But, the real story might be the fact that the affair came to light more or less accidentally as a result of poor email and privacy practices.
</p>
<p>
First, a little background on how things went down. The affair between David Petraeus and his biographer Paula Broadwell seems like something from the Showtime series “<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1796960/">Homeland</a>,” or perhaps a James Bond plot line, but the events that led to the FBI investigation that uncovered the affair are a bit more “<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093010/">Fatal Attraction</a>.”
</p>
<p>
Broadwell sent anonymous threatening emails to another woman she considered to be competition for Petraeus’ affection, and that woman—Jill Kelley—initiated the investigation that eventually unraveled the affair and led to the downfall of one of this generation's greatest American heroes.
</p>
<p>
I don’t want to teach anyone how to cover their illicit tracks better, or how to have a more clandestine affair, but let’s take a look at where Petraeus and Broadwell went wrong so you can understand how to cover your tracks better in general, and how to secure your email and protect your privacy online.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2014418/heres-how-to-secure-your-email-and-avoid-becoming-a-petraeus.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2014418/heres-how-to-secure-your-email-and-avoid-becoming-a-petraeus.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/email_internet_securit-100004070-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/email_internet_securit-100004070-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 08:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Attention shoppers: Patch IE now before you shop online</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Today is the eleventh Patch Tuesday of 2012, but the first since the official launch of Windows 8 and Windows RT. There are <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-nov">six new security bulletins</a>—a couple of which are particularly urgent, especially for anyone planning to do any online shopping this holiday season.
</p>
<p>There are four security bulletins rated as Critical, one Important, and one Moderate. The Critical security bulletins address issues with Internet Explorer, Windows kernel-mode drivers, the .NET framework, and flaws in Windows shell code that can allow remote exploits.
</p>
<p>
</p><figure class="right small"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/09/patchmg-100004486-small.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="140" height="93"/><figcaption/></figure>
<p>The most crucial of the six security bulletins is the cumulative update for Internet Explorer—MS12-071. Andrew Storms, director of security operations for <a href="http://www.ncircle.com/">nCircle</a>, declares, “Topping our ‘patch immediately’ list this month is the drive-by exploit affecting Internet Explorer 9. It’s fairly obvious that Microsoft patched this bug in IE10 before its release; otherwise, we would have a bulletin affecting both IE9 and IE10.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2013968/attention-shoppers-patch-internet-explorer-immediately-before-you-shop-online.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013968/attention-shoppers-patch-internet-explorer-immediately-before-you-shop-online.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/patchmg-100004486-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/patchmg-100004486-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:26:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Out of date, vulnerable browsers put users at risk</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
Is your browser up to date? According to the results of a <a href="http://www.kaspersky.com/images/Kaspersky_Report_Browser_Usage_ENG_Final.pdf">new survey from Kaspersky</a>—a security software vendor—nearly a quarter of the browsers currently in use are out of date. Surfing the Web with a vulnerable browser is a recipe for disaster.
</p>
<p>
The Web browser has evolved to become the primary software used on many PCs. People access their email, surf websites, create documents and spreadsheets, access cloud-based file storage and sharing sites, and share with others on social networking sites—all through the browser. Attackers no this as well, which is why it is exceptionally risky to use a browser with known vulnerabilities.
</p>
<p>
Kaspersky gathered anonymous data through its cloud-based <a href="http://ksn.kaspersky.com/en">Kaspersky Security Network</a>. Kaspersky researchers analyzed the browser usage data from millions of customers around the world, and uncovered some concerning trends.
</p>
<ul>
<li>23 percent of browsers are not current: 14.5 percent are still using the previous version, while 8.5 percent are using even older, obsolete versions.</li>
<li>When a new version of a browser is released, it can take nearly 10 days for it to surpass the previous version in usage, and an average of about a month for a majority of users to upgrade.</li>
</ul>

<figure class="left original"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/08/security_web_1_hp-11398627.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="243" height="182"/><figcaption>Keep your browser up to date to avoid Web-based attacks.</figcaption></figure>
<p>
The major browsers all have automatic update mechanisms in place. The easiest way to make sure your browser is current is to enable the automatic updates and let them do what they’re meant to do—keep your browser up to date without requiring you to manage the process yourself.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2013737/out-of-date-vulnerable-browsers-put-users-at-risk.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013737/out-of-date-vulnerable-browsers-put-users-at-risk.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/vanishing20web-2u-100007767-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/vanishing20web-2u-100007767-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:31:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Study finds 25 percent of Android apps to be a security risk</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>According to a <a href="https://www.bit9.com/pausing-google-play/">new report from Bit9</a>—a security vendor with a focus on defending against advanced persistent threats (APT)—there is a one in four chance that downloading an Android app from the official Google Play market could put you at risk. Bit9 analyzed 400,000 or so apps in Google Play, and found over 100,000 it <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/249215/symantec_shouldnt_backpedal_on_android_malware.html">considers to be on the shady side</a>.
</p>
<p>Does that mean that the sky is falling, and everyone with an Android smartphone or tablet should abandon it immediately? No. The research by Bit9 illustrates some issues with app development in general, and should raise awareness among mobile users to exercise some discretion when downloading and installing apps, but it’s not a sign of any urgent crisis affecting Android apps.
</p><figure class="left original"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/11/android-malware-thumb180-5240066.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="180" height="119"/><figcaption>Use discretion rather than blindly <br/>granting permissions to apps.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The report from Bit9 isn’t about apps that contain malware, or are even overtly malicious for that matter. Bit9 reviewed the permissions requested by the apps, and examined the security and privacy implications of granting those permissions. The reality is that many apps request permission to <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/250328/google_privacy_fiasco_lesson_there_is_no_privacy.html">access sensitive content </a>they have no actual need for.
</p>
<p>Bit9 says that 72 percent of all Android apps in the Google Play market request access to at least one potentially risky permission. For example, 42 percent request access to GPS location data, 31 percent want access to phone number and phone call history, and 26 percent ask for permission to access personal information. Bit9 discovered 285 apps that use 25 or more system permissions.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2013524/study-finds-25-percent-of-android-apps-to-be-a-security-risk.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013524/study-finds-25-percent-of-android-apps-to-be-a-security-risk.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/android-malware-inlin-100001974-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/android-malware-inlin-100001974-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Windows 8 raises the bar for PC security</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Windows 8 <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2012830/windows-8-the-official-review.html">is officially here</a>. Microsoft held an event in New York yesterday to launch the new OS, and spent a lot of time talking about cool features and introducing a plethora of hardware options available with Windows 8. One thing Microsoft didn’t talk about much, though, is security—and the new <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013087/microsoft-is-taking-a-huge-risk-with-windows-8-and-thats-ok.html">features in Windows 8</a> that will keep your PC and data safe.
</p>
<p>As with every previous iteration of the Windows operating system, Windows 8 is the most secure version yet. That really goes without saying, and amounts to little more than marketing hype. Each new version includes the security features of the previous one, but improves on them and adds new features to address potential risks missed by the predecessor. Not to suggest that Windows 8 is invulnerable, but it should be expected that it’s more secure than Windows 7, or any previous version of Windows.
</p>
<p>
</p><figure class="right medium"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/09/windows8-start-scree-100004900-larg-100006003-medium.jpg" border="0" alt="Windows 8 Start" width="300" height="183"/><figcaption>Windows 8 includes a number of features that make it more secure than Windows 7.</figcaption></figure>
<p>So, what makes Windows 8 more secure? Perhaps the biggest security feature of Windows 8 is really not a Microsoft or Windows 8 thing at all: <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/248426/r_i_p_bios_a_uefi_primer.html">UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface)</a>. UEFI is an open standard used to replace the archaic BIOS typically found on PC hardware.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2013139/windows-8-raises-the-bar-for-pc-security.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2013139/windows-8-raises-the-bar-for-pc-security.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt4.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/windows_8_-100010033-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt4.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/windows_8_-100010033-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:45:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Webroot SecureAnywhere 2013 adds protection for Mac OS X</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
Webroot <a href="http://www.webroot.com/En_US/consumer.html">SecureAnywhere 2013</a> is here. The new security suite from Webroot includes a variety of updates in the areas of performance, and the overall user experience. But, the most notable feature of SecureAnywhere 2013 is that it now also protects Mac OS X.
</p>
<p>
Let’s start with a look at SecureAnywhere in general. While the overall goal of the software is the same as competing antimalware and security suites, and it seems logical to compare them, SecureAnywhere is a whole new approach. Webroot completely threw out its flagship products, and started over by building SecureAnywhere around a more proactive philosophy based off the <a href="http://www.prevx.com/">acquisition of Prevx</a>.
</p>
<figure class="right original"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/10/webrootlog-100009106-orig.png" border="0" alt="Webroot logo" width="208" height="67"/><figcaption>Webroot SecureAnywhere is a whole different <br/>approach to defending against malware.</figcaption></figure>
<p>
The result is protection for your PCs and mobile devices that delivers blazing performance, and has virtually no impact on system resources compared with the traditional approach of rival products. The entire install occupies a mere 750KB—with a “K”—on your hard drive. It installs in seconds, and according to metrics from Webroot, the software uses 91 percent less memory than competitors, and completes full system scans in about a minute—116 times faster than average antimalware scans.
</p>
<p>
SecureAnywhere is a comprehensive security suite that includes a built-in firewall (only in Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete 2013), identity and privacy protection, social network protection, and seven specialized security shields—three of which are new to SecureAnywhere 2013. The USB Shield blocks attacks and malware from removable drives, the Offline Shield protects the system against persistent threats even when it’s not connected to the Internet, and the Zero Day Shield identifies new or changing threats to defend against emerging attacks.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2012553/webroot-secureanywhere-2013-adds-protection-for-mac-os-x.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2012553/webroot-secureanywhere-2013-adds-protection-for-mac-os-x.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/2013-boxshot-complete-squar-100009287-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/2013-boxshot-complete-squar-100009287-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:06:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Kaspersky Lab announces a brand-new OS focused on security</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
The past two years or so have brought a new breed of <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/261009/a_sinister_new_breed_of_malware_is_growing.html">scary malware</a> to the forefront of public attention, including the infamous <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/205827/was_stuxnet_built_to_attack_irans_nuclear_program.html">Stuxnet</a> worm that was discovered back in 2010.
</p>
<p>
Following hard on Stuxnet's proverbial heels, of course, were <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/242114/duqu_new_malware_is_stuxnet_20.html">Duqu</a>, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/256508/the_flame_virus_your_faqs_answered.html">Flame</a>, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/260735/gauss_malware_what_you_need_to_know.html">Gauss</a>, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/261092/shamoon_malware_cripples_windows_pcs_to_cover_tracks.html">Shamoon</a>, and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/261651/mysterious_wiper_malware_possibly_connected_to_stuxnet_and_duqu_researchers_say.html">Wiper</a>, to name just a few examples.
</p>
<p>
These new threats are generally thought to be state-sponsored in many cases and developed for cyberespionage against specific targets; another factor in common is that they tend to work through <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/229239/five_things_every_windows_user_should_know.html">Microsoft Windows</a>.
</p>
<figure class="right small"><br/><figcaption/></figure>
<figure class="right original"><img src="http://images.techhive.com/images/article/2012/10/kaspersky20log-100009032-orig.png" border="0" alt="" width="184" height="45"/><figcaption/></figure>
<p>
It's long been known that <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/202452/why_linux_is_more_secure_than_windows.html">Linux</a> offers numerous security advantages over both <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/10/avoid_windows_malware_bank_on.html">Windows</a> and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/230569/post_macdefender_linux_looks_better_than_ever.html">Macs</a>, of course, but security research firm Kaspersky Lab--which played a key role in identifying many of these frightening pieces of malware--apparently has other ideas.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2012282/kaspersky-lab-announces-a-brand-new-os-focused-on-security.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2012282/kaspersky-lab-announces-a-brand-new-os-focused-on-security.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/malwar-100009033-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt0.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/10/malwar-100009033-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Katherine Noyes</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Microsoft plans patch for critical flaw in Word next Tuesday</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>It’s the first Thursday of October. Do you know what happens on the first Thursday of each month? Microsoft provides an advance notification of the security bulletins it plans to release on the second Tuesday of the month—more commonly known as Patch Tuesday.
</p>
<p>Following an unusually light Patch Tuesday in September, Microsoft was forced to deal with the specter of a <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010043/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-internet-explorer-zero-day-attacks.html">zero-day exploit being used in the wild</a> to attack Internet Explorer. Microsoft responded with an out-of-band patch reflecting the urgent nature of the threat.
</p>
<p>IT admins will be a little busier in October. According to the <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-oct">Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification for October 2012</a>, Microsoft has a total of seven new security bulletins slated for release next week. Six of the seven are rates merely as Important, while the seventh—a patch for a flaw affecting all supported versions of Microsoft Word—is rated as Critical for Word 2010.
</p>
<p>
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2011214/microsoft-plans-patch-for-critical-flaw-in-word-next-tuesday.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2011214/microsoft-plans-patch-for-critical-flaw-in-word-next-tuesday.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/patchmg-100004486-small.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://zapt1.staticworld.net/images/article/2012/09/patchmg-100004486-small.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:30:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Microsoft pushes out critical security updates for Internet Explorer</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Microsoft has published an out-of-band security bulletin—<a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-063">MS12-063</a>—to address a vulnerability that is being actively exploited in attacks in the wild. In addition, Microsoft also released an update to resolve a <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2755801">critical flaw in Adobe Flash</a> in Internet Explorer 10—which is the default browser in Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012.
</p>
<p>Microsoft has responded quickly in its investigation of reports that a <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010043/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-internet-explorer-zero-day-attacks.html">zero-day vulnerability in Internet Explorer</a> is being actively exploited. Microsoft issued a security advisory with workarounds, and mitigating factors to help customers guard against attacks pending a fix. Then, it released a <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9231478/Microsoft_Patch_for_critical_IE_zero_day_bug_coming_Friday?taxonomyId=85">one-click Fix-It tool</a> to protect customers while kicking its developers in to high gear to create a more permanent fix.
</p>
<p>
</p><figure class="left original"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/149045-PDF Zero-Day.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="180" height="119"/><figcaption>Microsoft squashes some bugs in Internet <br/>Explorer with new patches released today.</figcaption><small class="credit"> </small></figure>
<p>Andrew Storms, director of security operations for <a href="http://www.ncircle.com/">nCircle</a>, praised Microsoft’s quick turnaround, but he also feels there is more on the line than just protecting customers from attacks. “Microsoft had to respond very quickly to this bug. In addition to the serious security threats it posed to their customers, Internet Explorer’s market share is at risk. Many security pundits and organizations have been telling users to switch browsers until a patch is available. I'm sure that got the attention of a lot of Microsoft executives.”
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2010324/microsoft-pushes-out-critical-security-updates-for-internet-explorer.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010324/microsoft-pushes-out-critical-security-updates-for-internet-explorer.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/149840-hp_090304_patchmgt.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/149840-hp_090304_patchmgt.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:10:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>What you need to know about the Internet Explorer zero-day attacks</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>Microsoft has confirmed reports that a zero-day vulnerability in its Internet Explorer Web browser is being actively attacked in the wild. While Microsoft works diligently to crank out a patch, it’s important for businesses and consumers to understand the threat, and the steps that can be taken to avoid compromise while you wait.
</p>
<p>Microsoft has <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2012/09/17/microsoft-releases-security-advisory-2757760.aspx">published a security advisory</a> acknowledging the threat. According to Microsoft, the zero-day exploit affects Internet Explorer 7, 8, 9. Internet Explorer 10 is not impacted, but it’s not completely safe because it remains vulnerable to <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/262153/microsoft_confirms_patch_for_flash_in_ie10_coming_soon.html">flaws in the embedded Adobe Flash</a>.
</p>
<p>The Microsoft advisory includes some tips that can be used to defend against this threat pending a patch for the underlying flaw. Microsoft recommends that customers use the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/259807/microsoft_rolls_bluehat_prize_finalists_concept_into_emet_3_5.html">Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET)</a> to implement mitigations that can prevent the zero-day exploit from working. In addition, Microsoft advises customers to set the Internet and local intranet security zone in Internet Explorer to “High” to block ActiveX controls and Active Scripting from running, or at least configure it to prompt before executing.
</p>
<p>Andrew Storms, director of security operations for <a href="http://www.ncircle.com/">nCircle</a>, puts the threat in perspective. “If your systems are running IE, you are at risk, but don’t panic. The reality is it’s just one more zero-day and we’ve seen an awful lot of them come and go.”
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/2010043/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-internet-explorer-zero-day-attacks.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010043/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-internet-explorer-zero-day-attacks.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/microsoft_internet_explorer-11356433.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/microsoft_internet_explorer-11356433.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:55:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		Tony Bradley</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Microsoft confirms patch for Flash in IE10 coming soon</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Adobe recently issued an <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb12-19.html">update for the popular Flash Player</a> utility to patch critical flaws that could allow an attacker to run malicious code on the target system. But, if you’re using Windows 8, the version of Flash that Microsoft has embedded in Internet Explorer 10 is still vulnerable. Good news, though—an update is forthcoming to address that problem.</p>
<p>Adobe responds quickly to patch identified vulnerabilities, and most Windows users are conditioned to apply security updates as they’re released, but Microsoft is responsible for updating Flash in its Web browser. Windows 8 hasn’t yet officially launched, though, and Microsoft’s initial response was that Flash would not be updated until after October 26 when Windows 8 becomes available to the general public.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/09/ie10-11405359.jpg" title="">Microsoft baked Flash into IE10, so it's responsible for patching it.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/09/ie10-11405359.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>A couple of the flaws addressed by Adobe were given its highest threat warning level, and are associated with attacks that are already circulating in the wild. Last week, Adobe confirmed that <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/262045/adobe_admits_flash_exploits_threaten_windows_8.html">Windows 8 users are still vulnerable</a> to these threats.</p>
<p>I asked Microsoft about speculation that a patch is imminent. Yunsun Wee, Director of Microsoft Trustworthy Computing, replied with this statement: “In light of Adobe’s recently released security updates for its Flash Player, Microsoft is working closely with Adobe to release an update for Adobe Flash in IE10 to protect our mutual customers.”</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/262153/microsoft_confirms_patch_for_flash_in_ie10_coming_soon.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/262153/microsoft_confirms_patch_for_flash_in_ie10_coming_soon.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/flash_icon-11364117.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/05/flash_icon-11364117.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:13:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>The FBI’s Next Generation Identification program could spot faces in a crowded street</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>
The FBI is getting ready to roll out a new nationwide program to better identify criminals called the <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/fingerprints_biometrics/ngi">Next Generation Identification</a> (NGI) project. The new program is expected to add biometric data to Bureau’s toolkit with iris scans, DNA analysis, voice identification, and even the ability to pick out a person’s face in a crowded street using surveillance cameras.
</p>
<p>
<figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/09/738px-three_surveillance_cameras-11405128.jpg" alt="" height="120" width="180"/><figcaption class="caption">[Credit: Wikimedia Commons]</figcaption></figure>The FBI and Lockheed Martin Transportation and Security Solutions, who won the NGI contract, have received $1 billon to make its NGI project a reality. According to <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21528804.200-fbi-launches-1-billion-face-recognition-project.html">New Scientist</a>, a handful of states have already created a criminal photo database as part of a NGI pilot program that will go nationwide by 2014.
</p>
<p>
Theoretically, the NGI system would be able to use its mugshot database to pick out criminals in a crowd using a face-matching algorithm. The program would scan for faces in footage taken by security cameras or public images uploaded to the Internet. The algorithm would then return a number of hits for investigators to look into.
</p>
<p>
Of course, this sort of surveillance raises some obvious privacy concerns. The FBI states that it has conducted a Privacy Impact Assessment for NGI and that the program falls in line with the <a href="http://www.justice.gov/opcl/privstat.htm">Privacy Act</a>. In other words, it’s totally legal and is not considered law enforcement overreach.
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/262141/the_fbi_s_next_generation_identification_program_could_spot_faces_in_a_crowded_street.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/262141/the_fbi_s_next_generation_identification_program_could_spot_faces_in_a_crowded_street.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/09/738px-three_surveillance_cameras-11405127.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/09/738px-three_surveillance_cameras-11405127.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Kevin-Lee/">Kevin Lee</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Get ready: Microsoft is raising the bar for encryption keys</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Great news! Next Tuesday is already Patch Tuesday for September, but Microsoft only has a <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-sep">couple of relatively minor updates</a> lined up. Don’t get too comfortable, though—you need to prepare for the changes Microsoft is making next month for cryptographic keys.</p>
<p>Let’s start with Patch Tuesday. September is a dramatic departure from previous months. Unlike the many months that have been <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/260869/microsoft_and_adobe_keep_it_busy_with_critical_security_patches.html">loaded down with multiple Critical updates</a>, or the fact that Internet Explorer has been updated monthly for the past few months, Microsoft only has two security bulletins scheduled for this month.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/212534-code_binary_180_original.jpg" title="">Microsoft will soon consider any cryptographic key less than 1024 bits invalid.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/212534-code_binary_180_original.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>The last couple of months have each had nine new security bulletins, and the average per month through August is 7.5. Two is a manageable number that will make many IT admins very happy. Throw in the fact that both of the security bulletins are rated as Important, and that they impact software or platforms that many businesses don’t even use, and some IT admins may essentially get this Patch Tuesday off free and clear.</p>
<p>Of course, many IT admins are still trying to catch up from previous months, and can use the break to finish deploying the patches they already have. Then, there’s the Java patch from Oracle that probably needs urgent attention if you haven’t already implemented it.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261986/get_ready_microsoft_is_raising_the_bar_for_encryption_keys.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261986/get_ready_microsoft_is_raising_the_bar_for_encryption_keys.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/patch-windows-thumb180-11333384.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/patch-windows-thumb180-11333384.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:51:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Apple device IDs hacked: What you need to know</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>A hacker collective known as AntiSec has published over a million Apple device IDs that it claims were captured from the laptop of an FBI agent. If you own an iPhone or iPad, you might be wondering what this hack means to you, and you might also be curious about why the FBI had your Apple UDID in the first place.</p>
<p>The information was acquired and released by the hackers as a political statement. The lengthy <a href="http://pastebin.com/nfVT7b0Z">diatribe posted on Pastebin</a> along with the hacked Apple ID info rants about <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/248464/has_anonymous_crossed_the_line_with_megauploadcom_retaliation.html">government oppression and hypocrisy</a>.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/213751-fbi_180_original.jpg" title="">Why does the FBI have 12 million Apple device UDIDs on a laptop?</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/213751-fbi_180_original.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>While the group has published one million and one <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/189436/apple_banning_hackers_from_the_app_store.html">hacked Apple device IDs</a>, it should be given at least a little credit for restraint. The details stolen from the FBI laptop included more personal information as well—such as full names, cell phone numbers, addresses and zip codes.</p>
<p>According to the letter from AntiSec, there were approximately 12 million Apple device IDs stored in the file on the FBI laptop. It chose to release just a portion rather than publishing all 12 million. AntiSec could have simply published the data it acquired without scrubbing it first, but the point it’s trying to make is <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/228984/tupac_and_wikileaks_hacktivism_live_on_at_pbs.html">against the government and the FBI</a>—not the individuals whose information happened to be in the hands of the FBI.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261876/apple_device_ids_hacked_what_you_need_to_know.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261876/apple_device_ids_hacked_what_you_need_to_know.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/privacy_iphone_apple-11386910.png"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/privacy_iphone_apple-11386910.png"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Plan X: DARPA’s Cyberwar</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>DARPA, if you didn’t know, stands for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. It's the government body that develops ridiculous things like flying tanks and other science fiction. Next month, however, DARPA is hitting closer to home with “Plan X”, a one-day workshop designed to flesh out the U.S. government’s strategy for war in cyberspace.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/08/newart_hacker-drawing-5203052.jpg" alt="" height="119" width="180"/></figure></p>
<p>Plan X is a two-pronged affair that consists of a general-access session for your standard contractors and government employees, and a secret session to map out where the US is going in the future of cyber warfare.</p>
<p>What will it deal with, specifically? The event <em>won’t</em> get into research and development of cyberweapons or vulnerability analysis. It’s geared towards defense: In the session, DARPA will focus on ways to “create revolutionary technologies for understanding, planning, and managing cyberwarfare in realtime, large-scale and dynamic network environments,” as well as how to research the nature and history of cyberwarfare. It's all to dominate the “cyber battlespace”, according to a <a href="https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=f69bba51a9047620f2e5c3a6857e6f6b">publicly available PDF on the matter</a>.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261720/plan_x_darpa_s_cyberwar.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261720/plan_x_darpa_s_cyberwar.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/08/newart_hacker-drawing-5203051.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/08/newart_hacker-drawing-5203051.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Jason-Kennedy/">Jason Kennedy</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Does Oracle Patch for Java 7 Fix the Zero-Day Flaw?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Oracle issued a patch today for Java 7. Coincidentally, Java 7 has also been the target of recent attacks thanks to a zero-day exploit. For now, though, its anyone’s guess whether or not the new Java 7 patch actually addresses the zero-day exploits, or to what extent.</p>
<p>First, a brief recap. A previously <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/261505/warning_java_zero_day_flaw_under_attack.html">unknown flaw in Java was discovered</a>, and a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit was developed in the popular Metasploit Framework tool. Metasploit is a tool used by the good guys, but an exploit is an exploit, and the fact that the exploit PoC code was developed for Metasploit means that the exploit is now in the hands of many more would-be attackers.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/malware-11353365.jpg" title="">Oracle already knew about the 'zero-day' flaws, so hopefully this patch fixes them.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/malware-11353365.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>According to the normal Oracle patch release schedule, the next routine update isn’t supposed to occur until October. However, Java is a popular and widely used platform, and it would probably be catastrophic for Oracle to wait a month or more to produce a patch.</p>
<p>Fast forward a few days, and voila! A patch. Maybe. There is definitely an update for Java 7 available from Oracle. However, it’s not yet clear what it fixes.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261671/does_oracle_patch_for_java_7_fix_the_zero_day_flaw_.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261671/does_oracle_patch_for_java_7_fix_the_zero_day_flaw_.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/mac_java_malware-11348677.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/mac_java_malware-11348677.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Warning: Java Zero Day Flaw Under Attack</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Java is under attack again. A zero-day vulnerability in <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/261484/unpatched_java_vulnerability_exploited_in_targeted_attacks_researchers_say.html">Java is being actively exploited</a> in the wild. The current attacks seem to be targeted, but security experts warn that more widespread attacks could be imminent.</p>
<p>Next to Adobe Reader and Adobe Flash, Java is probably one of the most ubiquitous and widely used applications. Unfortunately, it also provides attackers with plenty of holes and vulnerabilities to exploit, which makes it a popular target.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227405.jpg" title="">Security experts warn users to expect more exploits of the Java zero-day.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227405.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>Proof-of-concept (PoC) code has been developed for the Metasploit Framework tool. Wolfgang Kandek, CTO of <a href="http://www.qualys.com/">Qualys</a>, explains that this is concerning because it makes the exploit available to a much wider audience, and probably means more attacks targeting the Java vulnerability are on the horizon.</p>
<p>Andrew Storms, director of security operations for <a href="http://www.ncircle.com/">nCircle</a>, is concerned that it could be a while before a patch or update is released to resolve the vulnerability and guard against these attacks. “Oracle isn’t known for releasing patches out of cycle and the next scheduled update for Java isn't until October. Part of the problem is that Java is so ubiquitous that it tends to be overlooked as a ‘small’ piece of software.”</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/261505/warning_java_zero_day_flaw_under_attack.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/261505/warning_java_zero_day_flaw_under_attack.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/155094-Java_logo_thumb_original.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/155094-Java_logo_thumb_original.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Has Android Malware Tripled in Recent Months? Not So Fast</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>There never seems to be any shortage of <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/259100/security_researchers_find_multistage_android_malware_on_google_play.html">Android malware</a> reports circulating in the news, and today one came out that sounds alarming indeed.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/11/android-malware-thumb180-5240067.jpg" alt="android malware" height="119" width="180"/></figure>“Android Under Attack: Malware Levels for Google’s OS Rise Threefold in Q2 2012” was the title of the <a href="http://www.realwire.com/releases/Android-Under-Attack-Malware-Levels-for-Googles-OS-Rise-Threefold-in-Q2-2012">press release</a> from antivirus vendor Kaspersky announcing it, in fact, and right on cue headlines are popping up across the tech media echoing that dire warning.</p>
<p>But is it really as bad as all that? Probably not. In fact, as <a href="http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/The-alleged-flood-of-Android-trojans-1668760.html">pointed out</a> by security-focused publication The H on Thursday, data from competing firm F-Secure paint a very different picture for the very same time period. In fact, rather than a tripling of Android malware in the second quarter, F-Secure found only a modest rise.</p>
<p>How to explain the difference? It's all a matter of methodology, according to The H, which calls F-Secure's approach “more sophisticated.”</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260967/has_android_malware_tripled_in_recent_months_not_so_fast.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260967/has_android_malware_tripled_in_recent_months_not_so_fast.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/11/android-malware-thumb180-5240066.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/11/android-malware-thumb180-5240066.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Katherine-Noyes/">Katherine Noyes</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Microsoft and Adobe Keep IT Busy with Critical Security Patches</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>It’s Patch Tuesday again. This month is busier than most because on top of Microsoft’s security bulletins, Adobe is also releasing updates for Reader and Acrobat.</p>
<p>Let’s start with Microsoft. There are nine <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-aug">new security bulletins for August</a>, which resolve 26 different vulnerabilities. There are five rated as Critical—including a patch for Internet Explorer for the third consecutive month--and four Important.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227405.jpg" title="">Microsoft and Adobe released a barrage of new patches and updates.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227405.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>Tyler Reguly, director of security research and development for <a href="http://www.ncircle.com/">nCircle</a>, says, “The most interesting thing this month is the release of patches for two wormable issues, MS12-053 and MS12-054. These only affect the oldest-supported Windows platforms and really speaks well of the improvements Microsoft has made to their security efforts over the years.”</p>
<p>Andrew Storms, director of security operations for nCircle agrees with Reguly, stressing the potential impact of MS12-053. “This one has the potential for serious impact because it is network aware and no authentication is required. If you have XP on your network, then get the mitigations for this one installed ASAP.”</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260869/microsoft_and_adobe_keep_it_busy_with_critical_security_patches.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260869/microsoft_and_adobe_keep_it_busy_with_critical_security_patches.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/patch-windows-thumb180-11333384.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/03/patch-windows-thumb180-11333384.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Gauss Cyber Espionage Threat Targets Banking Info</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Gauss joins the ranks of Stuxnet, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/242114/duqu_new_malware_is_stuxnet_20.html">Duqu</a>, and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/256742/flame_spread_via_rogue_microsoft_security_certificates.html">Flame</a> as an apparently state-sponsored tool of <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/223483/mcafee_corporate_espionage_is_the_currency_of_cybercrime.html">cyber espionage</a>. This latest threat appears to be built from the same code foundation as Flame, and specifically targets bank credentials and financial data.</p>
<p><a href="http://usa.kaspersky.com/">Kaspersky Lab</a>--the largest privately held vendor of antimalware and endpoint security products--<a href="http://usa.kaspersky.com/about-us/press-center/press-releases/kaspersky-lab-discovers-%E2%80%98gauss%E2%80%99-%E2%80%93-new-complex-cyber-threat-desi">announced the new threat</a>. A Kaspersky FAQ about Gauss boils the <a href="http://www.securelist.com/en/blog?weblogid=208193767">description of Gauss</a> down to a 140-character tweet: “Gauss is a nation state sponsored banking Trojan which carries a warhead of unknown designation”.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/malware-11353365.jpg" title="">Gauss seems to come from the same code foundation as Flame.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/malware-11353365.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>Gauss has been flying under the radar and evading detection since the fall of 2011. Ironically, it was discovered during operations initiated by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) in the wake of Flame in an effort to detect and mitigate any other stealthy cyber threats. Mission accomplished.</p>
<p>Kaspersky was able to detect and identify the threat--dubbed “Gauss” because its main module is named after the German mathematician Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss—because it uses a similar architecture, module structure, code base, and methods of communication with command and control (C&amp;C) servers as its cousin, Flame.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260715/gauss_cyber_espionage_threat_targets_banking_info.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260715/gauss_cyber_espionage_threat_targets_banking_info.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227404.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/10/malware_virus_180-5227404.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Mat Honan Hack Pokes Holes in Apple iCloud</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>The hackers that <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/08/apple-amazon-mat-honan-hacking/">hijacked Mat Honan’s online life</a>, took over his Twitter account(s), and wiped out his iPhone, iPad, MacBook, and Google accounts in one fell swoop showed some perseverance in achieving that goal. Not all attackers are quite that determined, but the hack still demonstrates some serious flaws in Apple’s iCloud and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/260414/how_did_apple_allow_hackers_to_access_icloud_account.html">the iCloud security model</a>.</p>
<p>My iPhone, iPad, and MacBook Air are all synced through Apple’s iCloud--just like Mat Honan. I appreciate the convenience and simplicity of the fact that I can add a contact on my iPad, and it will automatically sync to the other two devices. I can take a picture with my iPhone, and the photo will be available from the iPhone and MacBook as well. It just works.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/08/screen20shot202012-08-0820at208.15.4720am-11394993.png" title="">With one username and password I can pinpoint or remotely wipe all of my Apple devices.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/08/screen20shot202012-08-0820at208.15.4720am-11394993.png" alt=""/></a></figure>The Mat Honan hack is a poignant illustration of how “it just works” can be a double-edged sword. If it “just works” for you, it also “just works” for an attacker who manages to gain access to your iCloud account.</p>
<p>The first potential problem with the automatic syncing is that someone with possession of my iPhone or iPad could <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/229823/icloud_raises_serious_data_security_concerns.html">wreak havoc</a>. If someone starts deleting contacts, calendar events, or other synced information, those changes should be automatically synced across to the other devices which would mean losing the information on all of them because it “just works”.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260574/mat_honan_hack_pokes_holes_in_apple_icloud.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260574/mat_honan_hack_pokes_holes_in_apple_icloud.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/apple-icloud-5181599.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/apple-icloud-5181599.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 06:17:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>How Did Apple Allow Hackers to Access iCloud Account?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>The Internet is abuzz this weekend as a result of the Gizmodo Twitter account getting hijacked. That incident was traced back to the hack of an <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/242401/syncing_icloud_with_windows_and_outlook.html">Apple iCloud account</a>--allegedly accomplished through social engineering.</p>
<p>A Forbes.com <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/adriankingsleyhughes/2012/08/05/apple-allowed-hackers-access-to-users-icloud-account/">story from Adrian Kingsley-Hughes</a> explains that a former contributor for Gizmodo, Mat Honan, was the original victim of the attack. Hackers were able to access Honan’s iCloud account, and remotely wipe his iPhone, iPad, and MacBook. The original theory was that the hackers used a brute force attack to crack Honan’s iCloud password, but further investigation revealed that social engineering was used to convince Apple the attackers were Honan, and Apple gave them the keys to walk right in.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/220704-apple_logo_thumb_original.jpg" title="">It took me months to "social engineer" my way into my own Apple ID account.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/220704-apple_logo_thumb_original.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>Color me incredulous!</p>
<p>Why? Well, I have my own story of Apple woe--and it’s the exact opposite experience. I somehow lost access to my own email address for use on iTunes, iCloud, and other Apple services, and it took months of fighting with Apple Support to finally get to the bottom of things and get into my own account. I couldn’t get Apple Support to give me access to my own account, never mind someone else’s.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260414/how_did_apple_allow_hackers_to_access_icloud_account_.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260414/how_did_apple_allow_hackers_to_access_icloud_account_.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/apple-icloud-5181599.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/06/apple-icloud-5181599.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 06:35:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Can Congress Protect the Nation&#039;s Critical Infrastructure?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>The nation’s critical infrastructure is at risk--a well-executed cyber attack could have a potentially devastating effect. Congress is trying to patch some of the holes with legislation, but a recent survey found that most security experts have little faith that government regulation can do the trick.</p>
<p>Sensational <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/230675/scada_systems_achilles_heel_of_critical_infrastructure.html">attacks against the critical infrastructure</a> make for great stories in books like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Zero-Day-A-Novel-ebook/dp/B00457X7XQ/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1344012512&amp;sr=8-3">Zero Day: A Novel</a> by respected security expert Mark Russinovich, or perhaps something from Dan Brown. But, many security experts believe that we are in very real danger of such attacks moving from fiction to reality, and that we are woefully unprepared to defend against, or respond to them.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/212534-code_binary_180_original.jpg" title="">Most of our elected officials are simply not qualified to craft information security legislation.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/212534-code_binary_180_original.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>What is the “critical infrastructure”? Executive Order 13010, signed by President Clinton on July 15, 1996 established the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection. It explains, “Certain national infrastructures are so vital that their incapacity or destruction would have a debilitating impact on the defense or economic security of the United States.”</p>
<p>Natural gas, electricity, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/244359/water_utility_hacked_are_critical_systems_at_risk.html">drinking water</a>, nuclear facilities, roads and highways, air traffic, railroads, and the Internet itself can all be classified as being part of our critical infrastructure.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/260315/can_congress_protect_the_nations_critical_infrastructure_.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/260315/can_congress_protect_the_nations_critical_infrastructure_.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/08/web-wars-180px-5211695.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/08/web-wars-180px-5211695.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>How to choose an office security system</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article>
	<section class="page">
<p>
<figure class="image right medium"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/shutterstock_14008075-11390383.jpeg" alt="Protect Your Assets: A Buying Guide to Office Security Systems" height="233" width="350"/></figure>We talk frequently about <a href="/businesscenter/article/259596/civil_liberties_groups_praise_revised_cybersecurity_bill.html">cybersecurity</a>, discussing how to protect your business’s data by using strong <a href="/businesscenter/article/259249/three_steps_to_avoid_getting_hacked_like_yahoo.html">passwords</a>, deploying antimalware utilities, and keeping your computers safe with the latest patches and <a href="/businesscenter/article/259631/windows_8_features_that_will_benefit_businesses.html">updates</a>. This time, the focus is on premises security, or protecting your business’s physical assets from burglary and vandalism.
</p>
<p>
The best cybersecurity measures in the world are useless if a thief breaks into your office and makes off with your computers.
</p>
<p>
You won’t lose any digital data if you’ve followed our advice to <a href="/businesscenter/article/223354/choosing_cloud_backup_for_pcs.html">back up your computers</a> to secure, offsite locations; but if your business is like most operations, it isn't entirely digital. You have paper records, including sensitive personal information about your employees.
</p>
<p>
Your business also depends on physical assets—computers, displays, servers, fax machines, and everything that goes with them—that you will need to replace if someone steals them or destroys them. Can you afford that kind of disruption?
</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/259997/protect_your_assets_a_buying_guide_to_office_security_systems.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/259997/protect_your_assets_a_buying_guide_to_office_security_systems.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/keypad-11390387.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/07/keypad-11390387.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Michael-Brown/">Michael Brown</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Mac OS X Targeted By Clever New Trojan</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>A new Mac malware threat has been discovered. The OSX/Crisis Trojan is an insidious clever threat. Mac users should take steps to defend against this new malware, and proactively <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/254645/avast_offers_free_security_for_mac_os_x.html">defend against future threats</a> while they’re at it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.intego.com/mac-security-blog/new-apple-mac-trojan-called-osxcrisis-discovered-by-intego-virus-team/">OSX/Crisis</a> is uniquely sneaky. First of all, the malware is cross-platform. It identifies the operating system, and executes different instructions depending on whether the target is a Windows or Mac OS X system. The malware is capable of infecting OS X 10.6 “Snow Leopard” and OS X 10.7 “Lion” systems without requiring a password, or any user intervention.</p>
<p>Once it infiltrates the system, it exhibits different behavior depending on whether or not it has Admin level privileges on the target. OSX/Crisis is exceptional in its ability to adapt on the fly to attack a broader range of targets.</p>
<p>Curtis Fechner, <a href="http://www.webroot.com/En_US/index.html">Webroot</a> threat research analyst, explained, “We've been looking at this and it's quite complex, as well as fascinating. I think the most important opinion we've formed is that we see more threats for the Mac platform like this one on the horizon.”</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/259963/mac_os_x_targeted_by_clever_new_trojan.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/259963/mac_os_x_targeted_by_clever_new_trojan.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/trojan_pc-11376727.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/trojan_pc-11376727.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>Microsoft Rolls BlueHat Prize Finalist&#039;s Concept Into EMET 3.5</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>Microsoft announced a new version of its EMET (Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit) software at the Blackhat conference in Las Vegas. What’s unique about the EMET 3.5 Technology Preview is that it includes new defenses inspired by one of <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/237301/microsoft_announces_bluehat_contest_for_better_security_solutions.html">Microsoft’s BlueHat Prize</a> finalists.</p>
<p>EMET is a free utility from Microsoft that adds an extra layer of defense to prevent vulnerabilities from being successfully exploited. The software is a collection of tools and mitigation techniques that can be applied to protect against attacks.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/malware-11353365.jpg" title="">Guard against attacks with Microsoft's new EMET 3.5.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/04/malware-11353365.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>One class of attacks that previous versions of EMET have not been armed to defend against effectively is Return Oriented Programming (ROP) attacks. Thanks to ROPGuard--a defense technology submitted for Microsoft’s BlueHat contest--EMET 3.5 will have the tools available to defend against ROP attacks.</p>
<p>“In less than three months, we successfully integrated one of the BlueHat Prize finalists’ technologies with EMET 3.5 Technology Preview to help make software significantly more resistant to exploitation,” said Mike Reavey, senior director of the Microsoft Security Response Center at Microsoft in a press release.</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/259807/microsoft_rolls_bluehat_prize_finalists_concept_into_emet_3_5.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/259807/microsoft_rolls_bluehat_prize_finalists_concept_into_emet_3_5.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/08/newart_security_laptop_180-5203451.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2011/08/newart_security_laptop_180-5203451.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item><item>
	<title>It&#039;s a Huge Mistake to Remove Password Prompt for Free Apps in iOS 6</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<article><section class="page">
<p>According to sources with access to the developer beta of iOS 6, the next version of Apple’s mobile operating system will allow users to download and install free apps <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/259741/apples_ios_6_removes_password_prompts_for_free_apps.html">without requiring a password</a>. If Apple doesn’t fix that before iOS 6 is officially launched, it will significantly impair the security of iOS devices.</p>
<p>iOS has established a reputation as the more secure mobile platform. The walled garden of the Apple App Store, and the scrutiny apps must go through before they’re available provide additional layers of defense lacking in other mobile operating systems.</p>
<p><figure class="image right small"><figcaption class="caption" href="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/207748-ios6_whiteiphone4diyedition_slide.jpg" title="">Apple is choosing convenience over security by removing the password requirement in iOS 6.</figcaption><a target="_blank"><img src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/207748-ios6_whiteiphone4diyedition_slide.jpg" alt=""/></a></figure>In this case, though, Apple seems to be choosing functionality and expediency over security. It’s a decision that could come back to haunt Apple, and all iOS users.</p>
<p>Andrew Storms, director of security operations for <a href="http://www.ncircle.com/">nCircle</a>, does not approve. “The decision to remove password authentication from free app downloads is just another example of Apple making consumers responsible for their own security, and that’s always risky at best.”</p><p class="jumpTag"><a href="/article/259769/its_a_huge_mistake_to_remove_password_prompt_for_free_apps_in_ios_6.html#jump">To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here</a></p></section></article>]]></description>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/259769/its_a_huge_mistake_to_remove_password_prompt_for_free_apps_in_ios_6.html#tk.rss_securityalert</link>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/ios6-11371831.jpg"/>
		<media:content url="http://images.pcworld.com/images/article/2012/06/ios6-11371831.jpg"/>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:37:00 -0700</pubDate>
	<author>
		<a href="/author/Tony-Bradley/">Tony Bradley</a>, PCWorld</author>
</item></channel>
</rss>