Downloads

Editorial Review of Actual Booster

Most recent User Reviews for Actual Booster

Not a member? Register Now.

Add Your Review

Email Address

Password

Sign In

Forgot your password?

Submit your Review

How long have you used this software?
Days Weeks Months Years

On a scale of 1 to 5 stars, how would you rate this product?

		Superior
		Very Good
		Good
		Fair
		Poor

What are this product's strengths?

What are this product's weaknesses?

What's your overall evaluation?

Submit

• Reviewed by: lacYIV23

  03-31-2008

  Duration of ownership: 1 Days

  Strengths: Noticible reduction in screen refresh time and transition times between programs. Simple to use. Does what it says it does. Price is right.

  Weaknesses: None observed.

  Overall Evaluation: I noticed an immediate improvement in the time it took to acquire internet sites. Screen refreshs and transition time when switching between programs also noticible improved. I may have a dozen or more Windows screen open simultaneously and being able to switch between them quickly is a welcome benefit. I set the priority process option to "real time". I have not noticed the erratic mouse response mentioned by Mr. Bass in his application description. This app looks like a keeper.

• Reviewed by: FredB

  03-31-2008

  Duration of ownership: 1 Weeks

  Strengths: It seems to do what it says. My laptop speed has increased a bit.

  Weaknesses: The source of this software appears to be Russia & this in itself makes it suspicious. As such it is still only installes on one of my old laptops that has nothing but games on it. If, after a generous amount of trial time, there is no other trojan or other malware behaviour, then I'll consider using it.

  Overall Evaluation: The source of this freeware (ie.Russia) makes me recollect the phrase "caveat emptor" or "buyer beware". The actual operation of the software does what it says it does & hopefully no more than that. Then the newer versions of keylogger & trojan malware will be better too. I'm hoping to be totally wrong in my opinion.

See more user reviews »