Quantcast
PC World: Technology Advice You Can Trust
Find a Review
Free Newsletters
Receive the latest reviews, how-to's, news, and more.
Weekly Brief
Daily Downloads
Daily Technology News
WiFi Finder
Locate wireless services by a specific address, city, state, country, airport, or zip code.
RSS Feeds
Get our latest content via convenient RSS feeds.
Latest News
Today @ PC World
Become a PCW Member
Join the community and start enjoying the benefits:
  • Get tech advice from thousands of PC World Members
  • Rate and recommend the latest tech products
  • Share your thoughts in blog and article comments
  • Get free excerpts and exclusive discounts on Super Guides
Read More About: RAM

Fast RAM Provides Low Value

Slim gains from low-latency RAM don't justify a steep price.

David Essex

Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:00 AM PST
Recommend this story?
Click here for full-size image.
Photograph: Marc Simon

With more retailers and boutique vendors touting high-speed (low-latency) RAM, two questions leap to mind: What is it, and do I need it? Last things first. Fast RAM is almost never worth the money, unless you're a dedicated gamer or gearhead obsessed with wringing every last millisecond of performance from your system.

Low-latency RAM takes less time to fetch the first bit of data after the CPU sends a column address strobe (CAS) signal to main memory. Such differences add up in tiny fractions of a second as your system processes instructions for the game you're playing or the database you're working with. Vendors list latencies for various memory functions; the first number is the CAS latency (CL), and when it's down to 2 on Intel-based systems (2.5 with AMD CPUs), you're really humming. Such memory carries a high price premium, often 20 to 40 percent more than slower RAM. A 512MB DDR400 module from Crucial, for example, costs about $100 at CL3 and $139 at CL2.

Vendors are careful to downplay any speed advantages. Latency differences may give you only a 2 percent boost in system performance, says John Stroozas, Crucial's director of engineering.

To gauge the benefits, PC World tested a PC with an AMD Athlon 64 CPU and standard memory, and then we swapped in faster RAM from Corsair Memory, Crucial Technology, and Kingston Technology, in turn. Improvement was negligible in most of our tests (see chart). Gaming tests showed the most benefit, with 4 to 5 percent gains in some cases. There was little difference among memory brands.

Low-latency RAM should eventually drop in price. But for now, if you didn't know what CAS was before reading this article, you probably don't need low-latency memory.


Recommend this story?
Latest News
Microsoft says its software conversion tools to enable Macs to read Open XML files will ship in June. 17-May-2008
The One Laptop Per Child effort cuts a deal with Microsoft to run its OS. 17-May-2008
Besides avoiding Vista, developers are still writing for the older version of Microsoft Office. 17-May-2008
A survey finds that almost a third of households get along fine without Internet access. 17-May-2008
Nortel surveys gadget-users in search of "hyperconnected" workers. 17-May-2008
The Guinness Book of Records confirms Grand Theft Auto IV takes the crown for debut entertainment sales. 17-May-2008
The malware continues to grow, hitting the dubious distinction of biggest spammer. 17-May-2008
A strong showing in April means Nintendo's console will likely surpass Xbox 360 sales sooner than expected. 17-May-2008
Hewlett-Packard's acquisition of Electronic Data Systems won't hurt Dell in the next few years, but it could affect Dell's... 16-May-2008
Microsoft confirms that it has yanked parts of a backup feature from a major upgrade to its Windows Home Server. 16-May-2008

PC World's Marketplace

PC World's Free Whitepapers

Name City
Address 1 State Zip
Address 2 E-mail (optional)