Pros
- Sturdy construction
- Good performance
Cons
- Keyboard has little extra functionality
At A Glance
The TouchSmart 7320 is functional, and performance is decent. But it fails to stand out.
Manufacturer’s Description
The all-new HP TouchSmart Elite 7320 Business PC has been completely redesigned to meet the most discerning style requirements with added performance, expandability, speed and power, it's everything your business needs in a sleek, modern design.
The Specs
| Pricing | |
|---|---|
| Part Number | XZ895UT |
| Processor | |
| Processor type | Intel Core i5 |
| Processor speed | 2.5 MHz |
| Cache size | 6.144 KB |
| Processor count | 1 |
| Memory | |
| Memory size | 4096.0 MB |
| Memory type | DDR3 |
| Memory speed | 1333.0 MHz |
| Display | |
| Included monitor | All-in-One |
| Display size | 22.0 inches |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
| Graphics | |
| Graphics Type | Integrated |
| Secondary Graphics Chipset | Intel Integrated |
| Number of Graphic Cards included | 1 |
| Video Bus | PCI |
| Storage | |
| Drive size | 500.0 GB |
| Hard Drive Speed | 7200 RPM |
| Drive type | Hard Disk Drive |
| Included Software | |
| Operating System | Microsoft Windows 7 Professional |
| Other Features | |
| Devices |
|
| Ports and Connections | |
| Ethernet Type |
|
| Available Interfaces |
|
| Slots |
|
| Case | |
| Chassis style | All-in-one |
Performance
| Overall Rating | |
|---|---|
| WorldBench 6 Score | 126 |
| Office Productivity | |
|---|---|
| Web Browsing | 255 seconds (lower is better) |
| Office Suite Use | 348 seconds (lower is better) |
| File Compression | 172 seconds (lower is better) |
| Content Creation | |
|---|---|
| Image Editing | 331 seconds (lower is better) |
| GPU Graphics Rendering | 315 seconds (lower is better) |
| CPU Graphics Rendering | 250 seconds (lower is better) |
| Video Encoding | 167 seconds (lower is better) |
| DVD Burning | 279 seconds (lower is better) |
| Video Editing | 173 seconds (lower is better) |
| Multitasking | |
|---|---|
| World Bench 6 Multitasking | 289 |
| Gaming | |
|---|---|
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 1024x768 | 36.4 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 1680x1050 | 17.2 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 1920x1200 | 13.9 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 2560x1600 | 13.9 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 1024x768 | 29.9 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 1680x1050 | 14.3 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 1920x1200 | 11.7 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 2560x1600 | 11.6 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry 2, Low Quality, 1024x768 | 21.3 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry 2, Low Quality, 1680x1050 | 13.3 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry 2, Low Quality, 1920x1200 | 11.9 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, High Quality, 1024x768 | 13.9 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, High Quality, 1680x1050 | 13.1 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, High Quality, 1920x1200 | 13.4 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, Low Quality, 1024x768 | 22.6 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, Low Quality, 1680x1050 | 13.1 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, Low Quality, 1920x1200 | 20.5 Frames per second (higher is better) |


































