Pros
- 19-inch LCD monitor
Cons
- Has below-average performance
- Disappointing LCD image quality
At A Glance
Nicely priced system was a mediocre performer; its 19-inch wide-screen LCD offered disappointing image quality.
The Specs
| Pricing | |
|---|---|
| Inventory Number | 25418 |
| Processor | |
| Processor type | Pentium D 805 |
| Processor speed | 2660.0 MHz |
| Memory | |
| Memory size | 1024.0 MB |
| Display | |
| Included monitor | No |
| Display size | 19.0 inches |
| Monitor model number | eMachines E19T5W |
| Display type | LCD |
| Graphics | |
| Primary Graphics Chipset | ATI Radeon Xpress 200 |
| Video Bus | Integrated |
| Video Memory Type | Using main memory |
| Storage | |
| Raid type | none |
| Drive size | 200.0 GB |
| Other storage | Five-in-one media-card reader |
| Expansion slots | |
| Open PCI Express X16 Slots | 1.0 |
| Open PCI Express X1 Slots | 1.0 |
| Number of PCI slots | 2.0 |
| Number of PCI-Express Slots | 2.0 |
| Green | |
| Energy Star compliant | 0.0 |
| Optical Drive | |
| Optical Drive Speed | 5.0 |
| Optical Drive Type | DVD±R DL/DVD±RW |
| Included Drives | 1 |
| Included Software | |
| Operating System | Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition |
| Ports and Connections | |
| Ethernet Type | Ethernet (10/100 Mbps) |
| Five-in-one media-card reader | 1 |
| Available Interfaces |
|
| Slots | 3 |
| Parallel Port | Yes |
| Case | |
| Chassis style | Tower (Mini) |
| Internal Drive Bays | 2 |
| External Drive Bays | 3 |
Performance
| Overall Rating | |
|---|---|
| World Bench 5 Score | 79 |
| World Bench 5 Word Score | Poor |
| Office Productivity | |
|---|---|
| Mozilla | 649 |
| Multitasking | 776 |
| WinZip | 463 |
| Microsoft Office XP | 602 |
| Content Creation | |
|---|---|
| ACD Systems ACDSee | 691 |
| Discreet 3ds Max OpenGL | 740 |
| Discreet 3ds Max DirectX | 403 |
| Adobe Photoshop | 433 |
| Windows Media Encoder | 388 |
| Adobe Premiere | 601 |
| Roxio VideoWave | 312 |
| Ahead Nero | 482 |
| Musicmatch Jukebox | 609 |
| Gaming | |
|---|---|
| Overall Graphics Score | Poor |
| Doom 3 with AA, 1280 by 1024, 32-Bit | 2.2 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Doom 3 with AA, 1024 by 768, 32-Bit | 2.7 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Doom 3, 1280 by 1024, 32-Bit | 6.17 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Doom 3, 1024 by 768, 32-Bit | 7.13 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry with AA, 1280 by 1024, 32-Bit | 5.44 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry with AA, 1024 by 768, 32-Bit | 8.95 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry, 1280 by 1024, 32-Bit | 12.29 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry, 1024 by 768, 32-Bit | 18.73 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Return to Castle Wolfenstein, 1280 by 1024, 32-Bit | 21 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Return to Castle Wolfenstein, 1024 by 768, 32-Bit | 31.1 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Return to Castle Wolfenstein, 1024 by 768, 16-Bit | 40.13 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament, 1280 by 1024, 32-Bit | 30.4 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament, 1024 by 768, 32-Bit | 50.18 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament, 1024 by 768, 16-Bit | 86.39 Frames per second (higher is better) |
Microsoft makes a play for the living room with Xbox One
Review: Fantashow makes (almost) fantastic videos
