Pros
- Category-leading performance
- Readily accessible innards
Cons
- Less cost-effective than its competitors
At A Glance
HP’s business-centric all-in-one lacks the bells and whistles of consumer-oriented machines, but it offers strong performance and some room to tinker.
Manufacturer’s Description
Capable. Integrated. Designed with enterprise class performance, manageability, and stability in an integrated form. Get a desktop computer, high-definition LCD monitor, webcam and more; the tools you need for your twenty-first century business.
The Specs
| Pricing | |
|---|---|
| Part Number | LA020UT |
| Processor | |
| Processor type | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Processor speed | 3.0 MHz |
| Cache size | 6.144 KB |
| Bus speed | 1333.0 MHz |
| Processor count | 1 |
| Memory | |
| Memory size | 4096.0 MB |
| Memory type | DDR3 |
| Graphics | |
| Secondary Graphics Chipset | Nvidia GeForce |
| Video Bus | PCI Express 2.0 x16 |
| Storage | |
| Drive size | 500.0 GB |
| Hard Drive Speed | 7200 RPM |
| Other storage |
|
| Drive type | Hard Disk Drive |
| Ports and Connections | |
| SD/MMC Card | 1 |
| Ethernet Type |
|
| MultiMedia Card (MMC) or MultiMediaCard (MMC) | Yes |
| Available Interfaces | DisplayPort |
| Storage Media | |
| Memory stick | Memory Stick |
| XD picture card | 1 |
| Included Software | |
| Operating System | Microsoft Windows 7 Professional |
| Case | |
| Chassis style | All-in-one |
Performance
| Overall Rating | |
|---|---|
| WorldBench 6 Score | 116 |
| Office Productivity | |
|---|---|
| Web Browsing | 257 seconds (lower is better) |
| Office Suite Use | 336 seconds (lower is better) |
| File Compression | 176 seconds (lower is better) |
| Multitasking | 307 |
| Content Creation | |
|---|---|
| Image Editing | 357 seconds (lower is better) |
| GPU Graphics Rendering | 318 seconds (lower is better) |
| CPU Graphics Rendering | 511 seconds (lower is better) |
| Video Encoding | 182 seconds (lower is better) |
| DVD Burning | 272 seconds (lower is better) |
| Video Editing | 192 seconds (lower is better) |
| Gaming | |
|---|---|
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 1024x768 | 55.5 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 1680x1050 | 41.8 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 1920x1200 | 24.3 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Medium 2560x1600 | 23.9 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 1024x768 | 47.5 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 1680x1050 | 35 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 1920x1200 | 19.4 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Unreal Tournament 3 Highest 2560x1600 | 19.5 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry 2, High Quality, 1024x768 | 13.9 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Far Cry 2, Low Quality, 1024x768 | 31.4 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, High Quality, 1024x768 | 24.8 Frames per second (higher is better) |
| Dirt 2, Low Quality, 1024x768 | 42.6 Frames per second (higher is better) |
Are we ready for a mobile-first world?
Smartphone chips could replace server processors in HPC, researchers say
