Quantcast
PCWorld.com is upgrading some back-end systems. Some site features, such as user registration, may be temporarily unavailable.

NEW Reviews Beta Feedback

  • Print

Buffalo Technology LinkStation Network Storage Center

77

Good

  • Pros
  • Inexpensive pick for home user
  • Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Performance: Poor: 58
  • Features: Poor: 53
  • Design: Superior: 95
Performance
Large File Test (Read)436.07
Large File Test (Write)558.58
McAfee Virus Scan Test394.66
Test Version1
Windows File Search Test104.62
Windows Files and Folders Test (Read)481.76
Windows Files and Folders Test (Write)597.03
Performance
Cost per GB$1.60
ExtrasProprietary software for backing up NAS and clients, print server
Tested performanceVery Good
Copy speed: Time (in megabytes per second) to copy a 3.06GB folder from the tested device to the test bed.6.35
Write speed: Time (in megabytes per second) to write a 3.06GB folder from the test bed to the tested device.5.13
Usability ratingOutstanding

User Reviews for Buffalo Technology LinkStation Network Storage Center

  • Reviewed by: VReggie

    Duration of ownership: 1 Year

    Strengths: Network Accessibility, ease of setup. Storage capability. Small footprint.

    Weaknesses: Slow to respond to write requests over network link. NOS on device limits file size to 4GB, which limits or excludes the use of NTBackup or other file compression backups. The hard drives are run of the mill, just as likely to suffer the same hardware failure you're trying to protect yourself from.

    Overall Evaluation: Although decently priced, and easy to use (for PCs) they're somewhat unreliable for totally automated backups. The units I've used seem to respond slowly to write requests, especially after long idle periods, which sometimes results in my backup software timing out. I've used NTBackup, Veritas Backup Exec and other compression based applications but have had the most luck using a simple XCOPY batch file.