Quantcast
Subscribe to magazine

PCW Shop & Compare

Canon 70-200mm EF IS USM Lens

70-200mm EF IS USM Lens

Compare Prices

* Total cost includes estimated tax and shipping in the continental US. Prices and availability are subject to change by merchant without notice. Sales taxes and shipping costs are only estimates. Please check with merchant for details.

SIMILAR PRODUCTS
Most recent User Reviews for

Canon 70-200mm EF IS USM Lens

  • Reviewed by:

    03-12-08

    Duration of ownership: 4 Months

    Strengths: Fast, Sharp Images, Great Low Light Capability, IS works great both Horizontally and Vertically. Also works with Canon 35mm Cameras

    Weaknesses:A bit on the heavy side, when coupled to certain Canon Bodies EX: Canon 40D

    Overall Evaluation: I had been looking at this lens for the past year, and each time I got close to buying I talked myself out of it thinking it was too expensive. I finally broke down and bought the lens without any regrets or concern on price. Its a fantastic lens which I now use on my Canon 40D and also on my EOS 620 Film Camera. It gives outstanding results on either body. I would highly recommend this lens to any Canon owner who can afford it. Like the ole saying goes you get what you pay for, and in this case you get more then your moneys worth. Try It You'll Love It!

  • Reviewed by: MobyMyster

    01-07-08

    Duration of ownership: 9 Months

    Strengths: Excellent build quality. Great pics too.

    Weaknesses:Cost and weight.

    Overall Evaluation: Great all around lens. Heavy. You won't want to carry this puppy around all day. Requires some practice to get the most from this lens as opposed to a "kit" lens.

  • Reviewed by: touristguy87

    09-10-07

    Duration of ownership:

    Strengths: sharp, fast, focuses very well, bright optics

    Weaknesses:aside from the $1600 cost and the 10pound weight? Nothing :)

    Overall Evaluation: I had this for a week to test on my 400D against a Sigma 18-200 F3.5-F6.3 that I was trying to decide whether I wanted to keep or not. The F2.8 was much better, not only did I have to shoot the Sigma at around F8 just to get a decent shot from it, the F2.8 was better in all respects, faster, better IS, better focus reliability, sharper, just a wonderful lens. It was like the difference between travelling around the country in a RX7 and travelling around the country in a minivan. The RX7 is a lot smaller and lighter and more nimble, but you're just not going to sleep comfortably in an RX7. The Canon 70-200 F2.8 was not perfect but it was a lot brighter, obviously a lot faster, and focused a lot more consistently than the Sigma 18-200. Now having said that the F2.8 lens was so heavy that a number of times I didn't feel like "dragging" it over to a different spot to shoot. It was literally like carrying a 10 pound weight around all the time. Might have been ok if I had a strap for it, but still. It was good for sitting in my bag and using for really long shots, though, but, of course, there would be the occasional short-range shot that would make me pull it off...it was nice to play with for a week. Still not really long enough and still didn't focus 100% accurately (don't try to focus on a boat unless it fills the frame). I'll have to post some shots from it later.

  • Reviewed by: NCAAShooter

    05-05-06

    Duration of ownership: 2 Months

    Strengths: bright f2.8 max aperture, IS works great, fairly sharp!

    Weaknesses:too short if you really want world class sports photos. & weight

    Overall Evaluation: This is an excellent lens. It is perfect for weddings, so you can be out of the way, and still get the shot. The IS works well. Color and contrast, both great. I will use the 70-200mm with my 30d for close range work for field sports only good for around 35 yards worth of coverage. This is a review, so i'm being honest in saying, don't buy this lens if you indent to use it mainy for sports. It is not intended for field sports, such as football or soccer. Those games require at least 300mm. Look into the canon 300mm f4, it will focus much faster. A lot of people think this lens focuses fast. And if they haven't used a 300 or 400mm lens, i can see how they would think that. This lens is of the hightest quality and performance, but no one uses this lens professionaly to get killer football photos, unless they are within 25 yards or so, on the eos 1d mark II, since that camera only has a 1.3x making it a 260mm. Every 100mm gives you about 10 yards of coverage on a 6 foot subject. So at 260mm would give you 26 yards of coverage, BUT... the enzone is 10 yards right there, so you really can't get close enough to your subject to really blur out the background to isolate your subject like you can with someone more powerful lenses. I'm not allowed to reccommend other lenses, (i'm not sure why, cause i could get you into something much better IF you are looking to shoot sports), so with that being said, this lens will be excellent for anything besides sports. Fantastic color and contrast, with pretty good sharpness. The IS version was noticably sharper with out the IS elements. I would be able to VERY easily see the outline of my girl friend's contact lenses with a 6.3 mega pixel camera. With this IS version, i can sometimes see the outline and that's with 8.2 mega pixel! But it's sharper than anything else besides the non IS lens out there. I will make a lot of money with this lens at weddings, and journalism subjects, because for those subjects there is nothing better.

  • Reviewed by: sligh

    03-14-06

    Duration of ownership:

    Strengths: Inner focusing, Full-time manual focusing, Ultrasonic motors, Image Stabilization and Ultra-low dispersion glass.

    Weaknesses:Heavy and expensive are not a weakness. This is like saying that your car can fit many people and is extremely spacious but then turn around and say it is too big.

    Overall Evaluation: It uses Inner focusing and is able to zoom without any changing in the physical dimensions on the outside. The "full time manual" focus allows for a larger ring to hold because it doesn't move when auto focusing and it also allows you to tweak the focus. Like any other Canon lens with Ultrasonic motors, this lens is quick and quiet. The image stabilization works like a charm. You can put your ear up to the lens and hit the focus button on your camera and hear the stabilizer kick in, it sounds like a piece of metal hitting metal and then a soothing hum. There are two settings on the lens, the first is for general correction and the second is for panning. The Ultra-low dispersion glass leaves you with a lens that you can shoot wide open in any light condition without the worry of chromatic aberration.Despite the camera you use I can guarantee you won't be disappointed with this lens. It maybe a bit heavy for some people but then again maybe they are holding the weight from the camera and not the lens or are still using their stock camera strap. I purchased a camera strap with a wide elastic part for your shoulder. I can't even tell I have got it on sometimes.You get what you pay for and yes it may be heavy bit is an extremely durable lens despite the technology packed inside. Well you know I would like to see a 70-200 in a faster model... maybe 70-200 2.0 or maybe a model with diffractive optics that would shorten the length of the lens. Still, it inst a weakness.Ive used this lens with the 10D, 20D, 1D and 1ds in the last three years, using it in the rain dropping it and I can say there is not a lens out their that can compare. Some people say that there are after market parts for cameras that are just as good. I agree, its called a camera strap or a bag. Sigma makes a wonderful lens. I have used them before but I have also broke them before. If you are using your equipment in an active working environment banging around with a second camera on your shoulder but something that will last.Justin SlighDaytona Beach, FL

See more user reviews »

Dell Fast Track

Shop & Compare Sections