Building a Civil War: NorbSoftDev on Designing Scourge of War Gettysburg

Today's Best Tech Deals

Picked by PCWorld's Editors

Top Deals On Great Products

Picked by Techconnect's Editors

1 2 Page 2
Page 2 of 2

Gettysburg Scourge of War

GO: When you were trialing new features, who tended to lead? Creative or developmental?

JW: It's never quite that obvious or smooth, and it's also more than just me in the role of the lead designer. There's a tremendous amount of contribution from everybody on the team. Norb isn't historically minded, so this is essentially a way to give him some real challenges in coding. And it's a really cool thing to do, to take something like this and turn it into real American history.

But the whole team's involved throughout. One person might throw an idea out and it'll ping-pong back and forth in email for a bit, and if it looks good we'll put it in as an official feature request in the tracking system. At that point Norb will look at it and determine how implementable it is. Sometimes he'll rotate it 30 degrees and tilt it a little bit to make it work, then put it out there for the team to test, leading to more back and forth until its refined and ready to go. So there's a lot of dialogue between various members of the team, you know, the map people want this, the scenario people want that. I get to make the final call if we're stuck on something and have to make a decision to keep the ball rolling, because you can easily get bogged down in the details here. This is a long process, and we're all doing it because it's a fun thing to do, not because we're expecting to get rich off it.

GO: Speaking of profits, the wargames market's never been where you stick your retirement portfolio. Why develop a game for such a niche audience?

JW: We're not corporate. Nobody's doing this as their day job, and we're publishing ourselves, so our timelines are our own. They're all self-imposed. We're not like Microsoft. We don't ship on a calendar. We ship when it's ready to go out the door and clean enough. We take a lot of pride in shipping virtually bug-free games.

Of course something as complex as Scourge of War...we find that as we go from six people playing it to hundreds of people playing, a lot of things that we never thought of doing, somebody else tries it and says hey, you've got a problem here. So there's always that process to be mindful of, but we've already rolled a few patches out and we're down to pretty minor stuff in terms of fixing apparent bugs.

GO: Did you spend much time at the battlefield gathering intel with the game in mind?

JW: We actually started an annual tradition of having a get-together on the battlefield for everybody on the team that could make it. Not everybody can, of course. The guy who did most of the uniforms is in England. The guy who's our wizard of CSV [comma separated value] files is in Germany. We opened it up this year to anybody who wants to show up who's a player.

We had one guy who did the historical scenarios, and he's been to the battlefield like 50 or 60 times. He leads a tour around for anybody that wants to go. Last year we supplemented that with the first open test of the multiplayer, where we rented a little conference room at a nearby hotel.

But a lot of going to the battlefield was just kind of know, we've looked at it onscreen and looked at the maps and looked at 10 different kinds of maps. So going to the battlefield's really just to get a feel for seeing it in three dimensions, in spite of all the tourists and monuments cluttering up the battlefield. That stuff's appropriate to a certain extent, but we're used to looking at it in 1863 and not 2010. So yeah, it's kind of cool to go up and see it in person and gauge how good a job we did.

GO: Speaking of battlefields, I like that Norb started with Manassas. After touring it myself, it's probably the easiest to take in and wrap your brain around and game without getting lost in the details. Gettysburg on the other hand...I mean, Antietam was crazy enough. I'm still getting my head around that.

JW: Oh Antietam...that's some of the most deceptive terrain I've ever seen. It's so sneaky. You look at it and think oh, little rolling fields, big deal. Then you go out and walk it and realize how easy it'd be to hide an entire division behind some of them, which of course is exactly what happened.

GO: Standing up in the observation tower you can't even see Bloody Lane because of the way the terrain slopes.

JW: Yeah, it's extremely deceptive. It must have driven the commanders nuts to fight a battle on something as sneaky as that.

In part three: Gettysburg unplugged...

Follow us on Twitter (@game_on)

Note: When you purchase something after clicking links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Read our affiliate link policy for more details.
1 2 Page 2
Page 2 of 2
Shop Tech Products at Amazon