Google joined Amazon last week in the cloud music storage party, and Apple is rumored to be coming to the dance soon. But with the biggest names in Silicon Valley trying to shove all our music into the cloud, are consumers ready to follow suit?
Streaming services like Rdio and MOG have more and more consumers caring less and less about the notion of actually owning the music they listen to, and analyst Aapo Markkanen of ABI Research says if we aren't on the bandwagon, we soon will be. But he doesn't expect Google's Music Beta or Amazon's Cloud Drive to be the killer app that convinces us to allow all our tunes to float up into the atmosphere. Instead, he's betting on streaming services.
"The number of subscribers to mobile music streaming services (worldwide) is expected to approach 5.9 million by the end of this year," says Markkanen. "ABI Research believes that number will exceed 161 million subscribers in 2016."
ABI says that growth will be largely driven by people moving from MP3 players to their smartphones for listening to music, as well as a gradual decline in the price of digital music subscriptions.
Technology expert Hap Aziz with Rasmussen College says streaming subscriptions are a harder sell in the near term.
"There are literally millions of music players in use that are not able to access content through the cloud," Aziz wrote in an e-mail. "I don't see people now throwing away their perfectly good MP3 players to run out and spend $100 or more for a WiFi-enabled device."
Despite the increasing ubiquity of 3G and 4G service, Aziz adds that the availability of low-cost data plans seems to be trending in the wrong direction to promote a widespread move to the cloud.
"The major wireless providers appear to be phasing out their unlimited data plans, so this does not set a positive stage... In two years' time, there won't be sufficient network connectivity (with a low enough cost) to allow us to move 100 percent away from local storage."
He believes the majority of users will still store their music locally in a few years, in much the same way that few people currently store all their photos on Picasa or Flickr, opting instead for a local drive.
ABI's Markkanen says the offline playback offered by the likes of Rdio and MOG offers local storage, albeit without the flexibility of full ownership rights that comes with MP3s. He concedes that might hold such services back, along with a lack of name recognition among average consumers.
"It's gonna take one of the big players to launch a subscription service and all those big marketing budgets to really push it to consumers."
Until that day, we're left with these few leading options for floating our tunes in from the digital ether. Aziz and Markkanen handicapped each service and came up with this primer on the current state of music in the cloud:
Unlimited streaming subscription services have left Pandora in the dust in the last year, but it's not a new idea. In fact, Rhapsody has been doing it for years. Still, in recent months Rdio and MOG have generated the most buzz thanks to competitive pricing ($4.99 a month for unlimited streaming, $9.99 if you want to be able to play songs on or offline from a mobile device), deep catalogs (over 7 million songs for Rdio, more than 9 million for MOG) and ease of use. Choosing between Rdio and MOG has proven nearly impossible for me - while it sounds good to have 2 million more tracks to choose from with MOG, I've found Rdio's interface and mobile app to be a little easier to use. Rdio has also just released an API, which might make it a bit more ubiquitous in the months to come.
Hap Aziz notes that both services are less expensive than predecessors like Rhapsody or Zune. "I'm wondering when Microsoft will buy (MOG) to enter the space." But he adds that "many users will want to purchase their music as well, or else they find out they don't have a car at the end of the lease."