Google+, Day 28: My Five Biggest Google+ Complaints

Today's Best Tech Deals

Picked by PCWorld's Editors

Top Deals On Great Products

Picked by Techconnect's Editors

30 Days With Google+: Day 28

My 30 Days With Google+ journey is coming to an end. That means it's time to review my experience over the past month and sum things up. Overall, I will say that Google+ has grown on me, and that I have developed more appreciation for Google's social network as a result of this experience. But, there are still some aspects of Google+ I don't care for, so here are my five biggest complaints about Google+.

1. Irrelevance. The Circles views should just default to listing contacts by name. I never did figure out what algorithm the "Relevance" filter is supposedly using to determine the order of relevance of my contacts, but I was able to figure out that it is jacked.

The Circles in Google+ are unique, and also create some unique issues.
In both the "People in your circles" list, and in the "People who've added you" one, the contacts I actually interact with--by email, or on Google+ by reading, commenting on, +1ing, or resharing their posts--are scattered randomly throughout, while contacts I have rare interaction with, or people I have never even heard of are listed at the top of the "Relevance" filter.

2. The Venn Diagram. Conceptually, I get the idea of Circles and I think it makes sense on some level. But, real life isn't that clean and tidy. People can occupy more than one Circle at a time, so the Circles overlap like a Venn diagram. I might have a cousin, who is also a co-worker, and a member of my bowling league, and a high school friend who is also in my bowling league.

It is an exercise to label and compartmentalize contacts as I add them to my social network, and it is a chore to choose on a post by post basis which Circle or Circles the information should be shared with. I like Circles for filtering incoming posts and enabling me to cut through the Google+ noise to focus on information that is relevant to what I am doing at the time, but I don't like the concept much for the things I post on Google+.

3. Cat's Out of the Bag. To expand on the Venn diagram issue, and why I don't prefer filtering my messages to specific Circles, consider the "six degrees of separation" concept. Using the same example as above, not only might my cousin be in my "Family", "Work", and "Bowling" Circles, while my friend is in my "High School" and "Bowling" Circles, but other people from my Circles may be in other Circles of those in my Circles.

Yes, it gets confusing. The point is that the extended Circles--the friends of friends--makes a very complex Venn Diagram that makes it virtually impossible to predict where a post will end up and who will see it regardless of which Circle I share it with originally.

Google+ does provide some controls to enable me to prevent the post from being reshared--but only after it has been posted...and possibly reshared. Even if I act immediately to enable the "Lock this post" feature that prevents it from being shared with anyone else, someone may already have reshared it in those few seconds that passed. Plus, there is nothing to prevent someone from simply copying and pasting the content into a new post to share beyond the scope I intended.

1 2 Page 1
Page 1 of 2
Shop Tech Products at Amazon