Amazon.com may have received illegal state aid from tax authorities in Luxembourg, where the company has a subsidiary that records most of its European profit, according to the European Commission.
The Commission is conducting an in-depth probe of the company’s tax affairs, because it is concerned that it gained an unfair economic advantage by paying less tax than other companies.
A decision by tax authorities in Luxembourg regarding the corporate income tax Amazon should pay there could violate EU state aid rules, the European Commission said Tuesday.
The probe into Amazon’s tax affairs is part of a crackdown on tax practices by EU countries that often seem to favor large companies. The Commission has already started an investigation into whether Apple profited from state aid said to be worth billions of euros through favorable tax treatment from the Irish government. It also opened similar investigations into possible illegal tax deals with auto maker Fiat in Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Netherlands.
“National authorities must not allow selected companies to understate their taxable profits by using favourable calculation methods. It is only fair that subsidiaries of multinational companies pay their share of taxes and do not receive preferential treatment which could amount to hidden subsidies,” Commission Vice President in charge of competition policy Joaquín Almunia said in a statement.
The tax ruling favoring Amazon that the Commission is investigating dates back to 2003 and is still in force. It applies to Amazon EU, a subsidiary based in Luxembourg that records most of Amazon’s European profits.
Based on the tax ruling, Amazon EU pays a tax-deductible royalty to a limited liability partnership established in Luxembourg which is not subject to corporate taxation there. “As a result, most European profits of Amazon are recorded in Luxembourg but are not taxed in Luxembourg,” the Commission said.
This royalty, which lowers the taxable profits of Amazon EU each year, might not be in line with market conditions, the Commission said.
“The Commission has concerns that the ruling could underestimate the taxable profits of Amazon EU Sàrl, and thereby grant an economic advantage to Amazon by allowing the group to pay less tax than other companies whose profits are allocated in line with market terms,” it said, adding that the Commission will investigate in depth to determine whether its concerns are confirmed.
The opening of an in-depth investigation gives interested third parties and the countries concerned an opportunity to submit comments. It does not prejudge the outcome of the investigation, the Commission emphasized.
Neither Amazon nor the Luxembourg government immediately replied to a request for comment.