Tremors are a-quaking throughout the PC industry, and the violent shake-up is turning former bedfellows into bitter rivals. Over the past year, PC makers have been vocally complaining about Microsoft’s recent decisions, and what’s more, virtually every manufacturer has put their money where their mouths are, turning to the open arms of Android and Chromebooks in ever-increasing numbers.
While you can point a finger at the ho-hum response to Windows 8 or the confusion swirling around Windows RT, no-nonsense comments from Hewlett-Packard CEO Meg Whitman on Wednesday drove home a much deeper-rooted trust issue: PC manufacturers are still fuming over Microsoft’s decision to introduce the Surface tablet and compete directly against their hardware partners.
But don’t take my word for it. Here’s what the manufacturers are saying about Surface, straight from the horse’s mouth, along with samples of each company’s ‘diversification’ efforts in the wake of Microsoft’s tablet.
Let’s start with the most recent. Here’s what HP’s Whitman said yesterday (via Barron’s):
“Current long-term HP partners, like Intel and Microsoft, are increasingly becoming outright competitors.”
No, HP doesn’t like the Surface—nor, apparently, Intel efforts like the itty-bitty ‘Next Unit of Computing’ desktop—crowding its turf. Somewhat ironically, Todd Bradley, the head of HP’s PC division, told Citeworld in November that he didn’t really consider the Surface ‘competition,’ per se, slapping the tablet with a verbal backhand.
“I’d hardly call Surface competition… It tends to be slow and a little kludgey as you use it …. It’s expensive.”
Whitman’s comments just a day after HP announced the $279 Chromebook 11, the smaller cousin to HP’s Google-powered Chromebook 14 laptop. And in August, the company released the Slatebook x2, a hybrid laptop- slash-tablet running Android Jelly Bean.
If you thought Whitman was blunt, you haven’t heard what Acer has been saying about the Surface since Microsoft’s tablet was announced.
Here’s what Acer chairman and CEO J.T. Wang told the Financial Times a couple of weeks after the Surface, well, surfaced:
“We have said [to Microsoft] think it over. Think twice. It will create a huge negative impact for the ecosystem and other brands may take a negative reaction. It is not something you are good at so please think twice.”
Not all PC makers are outright hostile towards Microsoft’s newfound device-focused ambitions. In August 20212, Lenovo CEO Yang Yuanqing said that while he didn’t appreciate the Surface’s appearance, he wasn’t particularly sweating it, either:
“They (Microsoft) are strong in the software, but I don’t believe they can provide the best hardware in the world. Lenovo can… Although we don’t like Microsoft providing the hardware, but even though they are starting this hardware business, we think for us that just adds one more competitor… We are still confident in ourselves. We are providing much better hardware than our competitors including Microsoft.”
In contrast to the other PC makers, Dell’s downright optimistic about the Surface. Here’s what Bill Gordon, Dell’s executive director for end user computing, told Phys.org in October 2012:
“We think Microsoft is trying to build the market, so we think it’s great. They are just trying to generate more excitement. Google did its own devices for Android, so I think it’s kind of the same thing.”
Dell didn’t take the Microsoft’s tablet threat laying down, though. Earlier this month, the company announced the Venue 11 Pro , a Windows 8 tablet with a suspiciously Surface-esque keyboard case and its own docking station. Dell has actually remained a steadfast supporter of Windows by and large, though it has recently expanded into Android tablets and the Ubuntu Linux-powered XPS 13 Developer Edition notebook, which remains more of a curiosity than a mainstream offering.
So, what’s Microsoft have to say about all this? Well, in March, Craig Mundie—a senior advisor to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer—implied that the Surface wouldn’t even exist if PC makers were able to pump out inspiring devices, as reported by The Verge:
“It became hard to guarantee a uniform quality of experience that the end user had… One of the big challenges that the company faced in the last couple of years was just the question of, would there be a very high quality physical device that would go up against Apple?”
Rather than staking its future on its partners in a world that’s rapidly shifting towards mobile computing, Microsoft released the Surface and reforged itself as a ‘device and services’ company, rather than a software giant. The risk is huge, and make no mistake: Microsoft knows it. Shortly after its first tablets were announced, Microsoft said the Surface’s mere existence could lead to sour grapes in an SEC filing:
“…our Surface devices will compete with products made by our OEM partners, which may affect their commitment to our platform.”