Infosys settles with US government for $34 million over visa dispute
By John Ribeiro
Indian outsourcer Infosys has agreed to pay $34 million to the U.S. to resolve all allegations about the misuse of visas to get Indian staff to work in the U.S.
The company, however, denies and disputes “any claims of systemic visa fraud, misuse of visas for competitive advantage, or immigration abuse.” This is reflected in the settlement, in which the U.S. government acknowledges that Infosys shows commitment to compliance with immigration laws, Infosys said Wednesday.
Its use of B-1 visas was for legitimate business purposes and not in any way designed to circumvent the requirements of the H-1B program, Infosys said in a filing to the Bombay Stock Exchange, reiterating a stand it has taken previously.
B-1 visas are intended for short-terms visits instead of longer duration H-1B temporary work visas, which are harder to get.
No criminal charges
The settlement does not involve criminal charges or court rulings against the outsourcer, and does not place limitations on its eligibility for U.S. visas or federal government contracts, Infosys said.
The complaint and the settlement agreement filed in court under the False Claims Act by the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas, Shamoil Shipchandler, could not be immediately accessed from the online records of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division.
The False Claims Act allows private parties to file actions alleging that defendants defrauded the federal government, with a part of the penalty money going to the private party in the case of a victory. Infosys came under scrutiny in the U.S. after Jack Palmer, an Infosys employee in the U.S., alleged that the company committed visa fraud and that he had faced mistreatment for questioning the practice.
Infosys is alleged to have used B-1 visa holders to do skilled labor in the U.S. that would otherwise be done by citizens or require legitimate H-1B visa holders, according to a copy of the settlement agreement obtained by the IDG News Service.
The company is also alleged to have misled consular and immigration authorities by submitting “invitation letters” that misrepresented the real purpose of a B-1 visa holder’s travel. Infosys denied both charges. It held that the invitation letters were accurate and their level of detail was appropriate for their purpose in the B-1 visa application process, according to the settlement document.
A memorandum to persons entering the U.S. with a B-1 visa also directed them not to mention activities “which sound like work,” or mention anything about contract rates. Infosys held that the memorandum was not intended to deceive U.S. officials and, in any event, it stopped using the memorandum in 2011.
Infosys had hinted that a settlement with the U.S. government may be coming soon, when it said earlier this month during its quarterly earnings call that it had made a provision of $35 million towards “visa related matters,” including legal costs relating to a proposed resolution with U.S. agencies over their “investigation into the company’s compliance with Form I-9 requirements and past use of B-1 visas.”
Form I-9s are used for verifying the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for employment in the U.S. “There is no evidence that the I-9 paperwork violations allowed any Infosys employee to work beyond their visa authorization,” Infosys said.
Infosys received in May 2011 a subpoena from a grand jury in the Texas court that required the company to provide certain documents and records related to its sponsorships and uses of B-1 business visas. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security found errors in a significant percentage of its Forms I-9 that it had reviewed, the company said earlier this month.
“Some companies are finding creative ways to subvert the H-1B visa program and bring in foreign workers to the detriment of American workers,” U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican senator from Iowa, said in a statement Tuesday in response to news reports of an impending settlement. Companies are circumventing the H-1B program by using the B-1 visa program, which does not have the same wage and recruitment restrictions of the H-1B program, he said.
The use of workers from India on outsourcing projects has traditionally been a contentious issue, particularly as Indian outsourcers are believed to replace U.S. workers.
Only 0.02 percent of the days that Infosys employees worked on U.S. projects in 2012 were performed by B-1 visa holders, Infosys said in its filing on Wednesday.
Of the settlement amount, $5 million is to be paid to Homeland Security Investigations, another $5 million to the State Department, and $24 million to the attorney’s office in Texas.
Note: When you purchase something after clicking links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Read ouraffiliate link policyfor more details.