The rumor mill favors some big news regarding Microsoft’s Windows 8 tablets, but the Los Angeles location would seem to indicate that Microsoft may have an entertainment angle in play, as well, perhaps a content store that will challenge Apple’s iTunes, Google’s Play, and Amazon’s services on its Kindle Fire Android tablet.
Rob Enderle, an analyst at Enderle Group told our sister publication Computerworld that Monday’s announcement could be an Xbox-like tablet subsidized with games that users would buy. “Xbox does do announcements in L.A., and they did just announce Xbox SmartGlass at the E3,” Enderle said.
Or, he added, the news could be merely a speculative product “designed to get the industry excited” with a focus on the tablet as a content-consumption device. “Content is where I think Microsoft is focused.”
Another possibility: That Microsoft may be getting into the hardware business itself, manufacturing its own tablet.
Whichever path Microsoft announces Monday, one thing is for certain. Windows 8 tablets are coming, and they’re coming soon. The question is, what will they bring to the party that other comers haven’t? And will these tablets be able to mount a credible challenge to Apple’s iPad, or the mounds of Android 4.0 tablets?
Here are five things that Microsoft and Windows 8 tablets need to have to make an impact.
Easy Content Acquisition
Apple and Amazon have excelled in making it dead simple for consumers to shop for their music, videos, and TV shows. Apple makes downloading content for local use as easy as it gets via iTunes, while Amazon makes it easy to download and stream from its cloud services (the Kindle Fire’s limited local storage makes it less viable to store your media locally).
Google’s Play store lets you shop for music, but it remains a bit awkward. And movies are still merely rentals, not buy-to-own. No TV shows in sight.
Microsoft tablets have a huge opportunity to take a lead here, if the company can master the shopping experience and cover its bases across music, movies, and television.
Even though we’ve heard the first tablets announced in early June at Computex, we haven’t seen anything firm about pricing. Microsoft tablets will need to come in at a price that’s, at the least, competitive with its Apple and Android competition. And ideally, at a price that undercuts the competition–just enough so that consumers take notice, and are enticed to consider something new.
Hitting this kind of pricing may be difficult, however, if reports that Microsoft’s charging manufacturers around $80 to $90 for the OEM version of Windows RT prove true. (Windows RT is the version of Windows 8 that’s designed for use on system-on-chip ARM processor-based tablets. These tablets are the ones that will most directly compete with Apple’s iPad and the variety of Android tablets.)
Microsoft tablets will be, arguably, more than just fashionably late to the tablet party. As such, tablet makers need to eschew last year’s specs, and go straight to something that will get shoppers’ attention. And like it or not, specs do get attention.
Things like a minimum of 32GB of built-in storage, and a high pixel-density display (at minimum, a resolution of 1920 pixels by 1200 pixels, which is less than iPad’s 2048-pixel-by-1536-pixel resolution but superior to the existing baseline resolution of 1200 pixels by 800 pixels on a 10.1-inch display) feel de riguer.
And upping memory wouldn’t be a bad move, either; current tablets are locked at 1GB of memory, but 2GB could go a long way to smoothing the playback experience while using the tablet for other tasks, too.
Next: True Multitasking and App/App Data Sharing
Today, you’re still somewhat limited in what you can share among apps in the Apple iOS and Google Android worlds. Often, the limitation is as much due to the app itself as it is the OS.
I, for one, crave a multitasking experience that works as smoothly as it now does on my laptop or desktop–and that’s something that, in theory, Microsoft Windows 8-based tablets and the apps written for Windows 8 Metro will bring to the table.
Sharing of Apps and App Data Across the Tablet and Laptop/Desktop
There are lots of cool apps created for iOS or Android, but the reality is those apps are locked into whatever mobile OS they were written for. The interoperability promise of Windows 8 is huge: Buy your app once, and use it on tablet, on laptop, on desktop.
That’s the promise of how Microsoft has billed its Metro interface, but we haven’t seen it in action. Yet.
The above is, in part, a pie-in-the-sky wish list. The multitasking and app sharing could pan out, as could the content ecosystem. But I’m concerned about where Windows tablets will fall in price and specs.
I do believe that Windows 8 tablets will face an uphill battle challenging on price, especially without subsidization (and I don’t mean false subsidies through carriers) or Microsoft offering a concession on how much it charges OEMs for the Windows RT operating system.
Jack Gold, an analyst at J. Gold Associates, theorized to Computerworld that, if Microsoft does announce a Windows RT machine, it will probably cost $600 to $800, the price tag most observers expect other RT tablets to carry, “unless Microsoft plans to take a loss on each device sold because they have to buy the same components as everyone else.”
Gold said Microsoft would not ultimately be able to compete with Amazon on price since costs would be higher for an RT machine and because there is no clear pathway for Microsoft to recoup subsidies it might pay to attract consumers.
There’s also a possibility that Microsoft may show off a reference platform on Monday as an example of what the Windows RT machine could do, Gold said. That would be the design that other manufacturers, like Asus, Lenovo, Acer and others, would implement.
However, Gold thinks that Microsoft would not want to compete with its own vendor ecosystem. “That makes about as much sense as Microsoft building PCs to compete with HP, Dell, and others,” he said.
Redmond Still Thinking Inside the Box?
Finally, as for the specs, I think what we’ve seen so far indicates that PC makers are treating Windows tablets as they would other categories, and they’re not thinking outside of the traditional PC box.
This is the same kind of product planning reasoning that explains why it was Apple, and not a PC maker, who introduced the first laptop with a Retina display. And that kind of thinking could keep Windows 8 tablets from achieving their full potential.