For consumers? Not so much.
According to the Los Angeles Times, Redbox has confirmed it is going ahead with plans for a subscription-based streaming video service. Amazon, also rumored to be working on a streaming video plan, may even be a launch partner.
Of course, streaming makes sense for Redbox. With three major movie studios enforcing 28-day delays on new releases, Redbox’s holiday rental earnings were lower than expected. The kiosk service’s expansion into $1.50-per-night Blu-ray disc rentals also failed to meet expectations, and parent company Coinstar’s shares plummeted. Streaming seems like a lucrative new revenue stream; it worked for Netflix, right?
And yet, when I try to think of reasons why Redbox’s Netflix rival should exist, I come up empty. It’s not that I don’t like competition, but Netflix’s only major deficiency today is the amount of streaming content available, and that’s exactly where Redbox is going to struggle.
Even if Redbox gets some help from Amazon, matching Netflix’s library and litany of supported devices is going to take a very long time. Without a bigger library or a longer list of compatible set-top boxes, Redbox will have trouble explaining why Netflix is inadequate.
Follow Jared on Facebook and Twitter for even more tech news and commentary.